Huge temperature rise in 2026?

[ see the Extinction page ]

A huge temperature rise threatens to unfold and it could do so as early as next year, as illustrated by the image on the right. Altogether, the rise from pre-industrial to 2026 could be more than 18.44°C by 2026.

The image conceptually dates back to 2016, when a strong El Nino came with a temperature rise that, when expressed by means of a polynomial trend that was extended by a decade pointed at a 10°C rise by 2026.

The barchart on the right has basically remained the same over the past ten years, be it that the historic temperature rise from pre-industrial has turned out to be larger (pink) and that the cloud feedback could add a further 8°C to the rise (grey). Also, aerosols have been split up into on the one hand sulfates (green) and on the other hand carbon monoxide, black & brown carbon and non-methane volatile organic carbon (brown).  

Importantly, posts have over time pointed out that humans are likely to go extinct with a rise of 3°C and most life on Earth will disappear with a 5°C rise, as illustrated by the image below, from an analysis discussed in an earlier post.

With the year 2026 approaching fast, it is time to have another look at how fast and by how much temperatures could rise. 

[ from earlier post ]

The image below shows how, over the course of the year, temperature anomalies in 2023, 2024 and 2025 each have at times reached the highest daily records, even though 2025 wasn't an El Niño year. The image shows temperature anomalies from 1940 through to December 29, 2025, compared to 1991-2020, which isn't pre-industrial.

[ click on images to enlarge ]

The image below, from an earlier post, shows NASA Land Only monthly temperature anomalies (black squares) with respect to 1880-1890 (not pre-industrial) through November 2025 and shows the 1.5°C threshold crossed for all months since 2022. The Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that the 2°C threshold was crossed in 2022 and that 3°C may get crossed in 2028 if this trend continues (dashed extension). The picture could look even worse when a genuinely pre-industrial base was used and a polynomial trend was applied and extended.

[ Potential Land-only rise, from earlier post ]

As said, the image at the top shows very high temperatures in 2025, even though 2025 wasn't an El Niño year. In other words, current temperatures are suppressed. Moving from the bottom of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño can in itself make a difference of more than 0.5°C. This is illustrated by the image below, from an earlier post, that shows a temperature rise of more than 0.5°C from November 2022 to March 2023, when the last El Niño had not yet even started.

[ Temperature rise due to El Niño from earlier post ]

How deep into La Niña conditions are we at the moment? Sea surface temperatures in the Niño-3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean (5°N-5°S, 120°W-170°W) are indicative for El Niño/La Niña conditions. The image below shows the location of that region (square on the globe, inset) and graphs with the sea surface temperatures in the Niño-3.4 region for each of the days of the years from 1981 through December 27, 2025. 

The image below shows a graph with temperature anomalies in the Niño-3.4 region from 1950 through November 2025, when the anomaly was -0.68°C.

[ click on images to enlarge ]

The image on the right shows a NOAA update of Niño-3.4 region temperature anomalies and forecasts. 

NOAA considers a La Niña event to occur when a one-month negative sea surface temperature anomaly of -0.5° C or less is observed in the Niño-3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean (5°N-5°S, 120°W-170°W) and is forecasted to persist for three consecutive months, while an atmospheric response typically associated with La Niña must also be observed over the equatorial Pacific Ocean.

[ from an earlier post ]

The image on the right, adapted from NOAA, shows ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) probabilities, with El Niño (red bar) emerging in the course of 2026.

The graph below, adapted from tropicaltidbits, uses CDAS (Climate Data Assimilation System) data showing an anomaly of -1.272°C on Dec 28, 2025. The graph gives another idea as to how deep we have descended into La Niña conditions.

The CDAS analysis below shows very low sea surface temperature anomalies (in blue) in the Niño3.4 region in the Central Pacific on December 28, 2025.

The image below, adapted from ECMWF, shows the ENSO anomalies and forecasts for developments through November 2026 in Niño3.4 (left panel) and in Niño1+2 (right panel), indicating that the next El Niño will emerge and strengthen in the course of 2026.

[ from earlier post ]

How large could the temperatures rise be?

Sea ice is low at both poles. The image below shows Antarctic sea ice on December 31, 2025. Massive loss of albedo amplifies the decline of Antarctic sea ice and the decline of the snow and ice cover over Antarctica, resulting in elevated global temperatures that could persist through September 2026, when Arctic sea ice typically reaches its minimum extent. 

Moving from the depth of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño in itself could make a difference in the global temperature of more than 0.5°C, as said. Add up feedbacks and the combined impact could trigger a huge temperature rise, since the rise is already accelerating, due to the self-amplifying nature of feedbacks such as albedo loss and more water vapor in the atmosphere, and due to further feedbacks that come with the temperature rise itself such as ocean stratification.

[ image from earlier post ]

[ from earlier post ]

Oceans are still absorbing an estimated 91% of the excess heat energy trapped in the Earth's climate system due to human-caused global warming. If just a small part of that heat instead remains in the atmosphere, this could constitute a huge rise in air temperature. Heat already stored in the deeper layers of the ocean could also rise up and commit Earth to further additional surface warming in the future.

The image on the right illustrates how the temperature rise can cause oceans to take up less heat, resulting in more heat remaining in the atmosphere. 

[ from earlier post ]

The above image shows very high temperature anomalies forecast around Antarctica and over the Arctic Ocean for September 2026, at a time when Arctic sea ice volume is expected to be very low. Arctic sea ice volume is at a record low for the time of year, it has been at a record daily low for well over a year. The image below shows Arctic sea ice volume through December 30, 2025.

There is a huge danger that seafloor methane and methane from thawing terrestrial permafrost will add strongly and abruptly to the temperature rise, as discussed in many earlier posts such as this one and as illustrated by the screenshot below.

[ screenshot from earlier post ]

The methane danger is further illustrated by the image below that shows hourly average in situ methane measurements well above 2400 ppb (parts per billion). The image is adapted from an image issued by NOAA December 31, 2025. The image shows methane recorded over the past few years at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North latitude.

Climate Emergency Declaration

UN secretary-general António Guterres recently spoke about the need for “a credible global response plan to get us on track” regarding the international goal of limiting the global temperature rise. “The science demands action, the law commands it,” Guterres said, in reference to a recent international court of justice ruling. “The economics compel it and people are calling for it.”

What could be added is that the situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as this 2022 post and this one and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.

Links

• Climate Reanalyzer
https://climatereanalyzer.org

• NSIDC - Sea Ice Today
https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today

• Tropicaltidbits.com
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com

• Copernicus
https://pulse.climate.copernicus.eu

• NOAA - ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf

• NOAA - ENSO sea surface temperatures
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/enso/sst

• ECMWF
https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_nino_annual_plumes

• The threat of seafloor methane eruptions
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-threat-of-seafloor-methane-eruptions.html

• Feedbacks in the Arctic
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/feedbacks.html

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Data Visualisation - flask and station methane measurements
https://gml.noaa.gov/dv/iadv

• Focus on Antarctica
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/09/focus-on-antarctica.html

• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice volume and thickness
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• University of Bremen - sea ice concentration and thickness
https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/start

• When Will We Die?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2019/06/when-will-we-die.html

• Pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html

• Extinction
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html

Focus on Antarctica

The Antarctic sea ice area was 1.27 million km² below the 1981-2010 mean on September 23, 2025, a deviation from 1981-2010 of -3.05σ, as illustrated by the image below.

This is far below what the Antarctic sea ice area was in 1981-2010. If the situation gets worse over the next few months, an Antarctic Blue Ocean Event may well occur early 2026. In 2023, the Antarctic sea ice was very close to a Blue Ocean Event, with an area of only 1.09 million km² left on February 22, 2023. This is much lower than the record Arctic sea ice area minimum of 2.24 million km² reached on September 12, 2012, as illustrated by the combination image below.

Sea ice loss results in Albedo loss, i.e. less sunlight getting reflected back into space and instead getting absorbed by the ocean and the impact of Antarctic sea ice loss is even stronger than Arctic sea ice loss, since Antarctic sea ice is located closer to the Equator. A warmer Southern Ocean also comes with fewer bright clouds, further reducing albedo. 

The image below shows the Antarctic sea ice thickness on September 23, 2025. 

The image below shows the Antarctic sea ice concentration on September 23, 2025. 

Earth's energy imbalance

Temperatures keep rising as Earth's energy imbalance keeps rising, which results from a combination of high (and rising) levels of pollution (including concentrations of greenhouse gases, other gases and warming aerosols) and loss of Earth's albedo (reflectivity). Furthermore, rising temperatures come with feedbacks that can speed up acceleration of the temperature rise. 

The image below, by Eliot Jacobson, shows Earth's Energy Imbalance through July 2025 (12-month running mean). 

The image below, by Leon Simons, shows the Energy Imbalance in the Northern Hemisphere (left) and the Southern Hemisphere (right). The image is also discussed on facebook. 

Albedo loss over the years is illustrated by the graph below, by Eliot Jacobson (based on data through July 2025, 36-month running average). 

Albedo loss results from a decrease in cooling aerosols and from certain feedbacks that are kicking in with increasing ferocity as temperatures rise, including less lower clouds and decline of the snow and ice cover. With the temperature rise also come further feedbacks such as more water vapor in the atmosphere and more extreme weather events that can cause deforestation and associated reductions in cooling aerosols, as illustrated by the Danger Diagram below. 

Many feedbacks are self-amplifying and can also amplify other feedbacks, further speeding up acceleration of the temperature rise, as illustrated by the image below. 

[ from earlier post ]

El Niño 2026 prospect

Furthermore, a new El Niño may emerge soon. El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a climate pattern that fluctuates from El Niño to La Niña conditions and back. El Niño raises temperatures, whereas La Niña suppresses temperatures. This year, there have been neutral to borderline La Niña conditions, as illustrated by the image below, which shows the rises and falls of the sea surface temperature in Niño 3.4, an area in the Pacific (inset) that is critical to the development of El Niño. 

On September 27, 2025, the temperature reached an anomaly in this area of -0.67°C versus 1991-2020. The inset on the above image shows the Niño 3.4 area and the sea surface temperature anomaly versus 1991-2020 that day. The low temperatures in Niño 3.4 over the past few months indicate that La Niña conditions will likely dominate in the remainder of 2025, which implies suppression of the 2025 global temperatures.

A strong La Niña could spell bad news for Antarctic sea ice. A recent study led by Shaoyin Wang shows that the triple-dip La Niña event during 2021–2023 played a major role in record low February Antarctic sea ice extent reached in 2022 and 2023, while the Antarctic ice sheet experienced a transient mass gain rebound.

As also described in earlier posts such as this one and this one, more water evaporates from the Southern Ocean and part of it falls on the Antarctic ice sheet, thickening the snow layer. As a result, the Southern Ocean surface is getting more salty. Saltier surface waters sink more readily, allowing heat from the deep to rise, which can melt Antarctic sea ice from below, even during winter, making it harder for ice to reform. This vertical circulation also draws up more salt from deeper layers, reinforcing the cycle.

[ image from earlier post ]

On the other hand, a new El Niño may emerge soon. The image on the right, adapted from ECMWF, shows an ENSO forecast for developments in Niño3.4 through August 2026, indicating that the next El Niño may emerge in 2026 and grow in strength in the course of 2026.

In conclusion, an Antarctic Blue Ocean Event may occur early 2026 and this could be followed by an Arctic Blue Ocean Event later in 2026, in particular if a strong El Niño will emerge in the course of 2026 and further feedbacks are triggered, such as seafloor methane eruptions. 

Why a Blue Ocean Event is so dangerous

[ from earlier post ]

PIOMAS estimates that 16,400 km³ of ice is lost every year (1979-2010 average) from April to September, consuming an amount of energy of 5 x 10²¹ Joules (the image on the right shows calculations, click on this link or on the image to enlarge).

Once the latent heat buffer is lost, further heat must go elsewhere. During the phase change from ice to water, the temperature doesn't rise, i.e. all the energy goes into the process of changing ice into water. Once all ice has melted, further heat will raise the temperature of the water. The amount of energy that is consumed in the process of melting the ice is as much as it takes to heat an equivalent mass of water from zero°C to 80°C. 

Decline of the snow and ice cover comes with numerous feedbacks, the loss of the latent heat buffer (feedback #14 on the feedbacks page) is only one of them. Further feedbacks include the loss of albedo (feedback #1), increases in emissions (feedback #2), loss of emissivity (feedback #23), while there are also changes to the Jet Stream (feedback #14) and changes to clouds and water vapor (feedback #20), and there are mechanisms and circumstances aggravating the danger, such as the slowdown of AMOC and further changes to ocean currents.

[ The Buffer is gone, from Accelerating Temperature Rise ]

Sea ice constitutes a buffer that previously consumed much incoming ocean heat (left); as sea ice thins, the buffer disappears while more heat also enters the Arctic Ocean (right). Further heat entering the Arctic Ocean from the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean threatens to destabilize sediments that contain methane, causing eruption of huge amounts of methane.

Eruption of methane from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean (feedback #16) is one of the most dangerous feedbacks. As the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean heats up, heat can penetrate sediments and cause destabilization of hydrates, resulting in eruption of methane. As the seas in the Arctic Ocean can be very shallow, the methane can erupt with force in the form of plumes, with little opportunity for the methane to get decomposed in the water. Furthermore, there is very little hydroxyl in the air over the Arctic, which extends the lifetime of methane over the Arctic.

Ominously, the sea surface temperature anomaly versus 1951-1980 in the north mid latitudes (inset) reached a record monthly high of 1.657°C in August 2025, as illustrated by the image below.

Meanwhile, the Arctic sea ice remains at a record low daily volume, as it has been for more than a year.  

The methane danger is also illustrated by the image below, adapted from an image issued by NOAA September 29, 2025, showing hourly methane averages recorded at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North. 

The image below shows methane concentrations as high as 2622 parts per billion (ppb) recorded by the NOAA 20 satellite on September 30, 2025 am, at 399.1 mb. Note the high methane concentrations over the Arctic, over Antarctica and over the Antarctic sea ice.

While the Antarctic methane danger has been described before, such as in this April 2013 post, the main focus of the Arctic-news blog has long been on the Arctic, in particular on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS). However, recent research highlights the dire situation in Antarctica, justifying an additional wider focus on global developments, as discussed on facebook.

The above image, from Ted Scambos et al. (2017), illustrates the dangerous situation in Antarctica. The danger is that progressively stronger intrusion of warm and salty water underneath Antarctic glaciers can destabilize methane hydrates and cause eruption of huge amounts of methane held in and underneath such hydrates, as also discussed here on facebook.

Climate Emergency Declaration

UN secretary-general António Guterres recently spoke about the need for “a credible global response plan to get us on track” regarding the international goal of limiting the global temperature rise. “The science demands action, the law commands it,” Guterres said, in reference to a recent international court of justice ruling. “The economics compel it and people are calling for it.” 

What could be added is that the situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as this 2022 post and this one and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.

Links

• Kevin Pluck - Sea ice visuals
https://seaice.visuals.earth

• University of Bremen - sea ice concentration and thickness
https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/start

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Data Visualisation - flask and station methane measurements
https://gml.noaa.gov/dv/iadv

• Record high increase in carbon dioxide
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/04/record-high-increase-in-carbon-dioxide.html

• Double Blue Ocean Event 2026?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/09/double-blue-ocean-event-2026.html

• Strong impact of the rare three-year La Niña event on Antarctic surface climate changes in 2021–2023 - by Shaoyin Wang et al.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-025-01066-0

• Extreme Heat Risk
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/08/extreme-heat-risk.html

• Saltier water, less sea ice 

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/07/saltier-water-less-sea-ice.html

• How much, how fast?: A science review and outlook for research on the instability of Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier in the 21st century - by Ted Scambos et al. (2017)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092181811630491X

• Antarctic seep emergence and discovery in the shallow coastal environment - by Sarah Seabrook et al. 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63404-3

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html

Double Blue Ocean Event 2026? (update)

Arctic sea ice looks set to continue to be at record low daily volume, as it has been for more than a year. The image below shows Arctic sea ice volume through September 22, 2025. 

While Arctic sea ice volume continues to be at record daily low levels, its decline since its maximum in April through to its minimum in September has been relatively slim this year, which can be the result of natural variability (including of wind patterns), of an increase of freshwater and of slowing down of AMOC (as also discussed in comments on facebook). 

At the same time, sea surface temperatures have kept rising, with huge amounts of ocean heat accumulating at higher latitudes north recently, as illustrated by the image below that shows sea surface temperature anomalies at 30°N-90°N. 

[ image from earlier post, click to enlarge ]

High (and rising) greenhouse gas concentrations combined with a decrease in aerosol masking are causing Earth's energy imbalance to keep rising, which comes with feedbacks including more water vapor in the atmosphere, a decrease in lower clouds and decline of the snow and ice cover. 

The decline of sea ice is illustrated by the image below that shows the global sea ice area anomaly through September 21, 2025, when the global sea ice area was 2.48 million km² below the 1981-2010 mean, a deviation from 1981-2010 of -3.72σ. Critically, the global sea ice anomaly has been very low in 2025 (in blue) and this occurred in the absence of an El Niño.

Antarctic sea ice 

Ominously, the Antarctic sea ice area anomaly is very low. The image below shows the 2025 anomaly (in black) from April through September 22, 2025, when the Antarctic sea ice area was 1.30 million km² below the 1981-2010 mean, a deviation from 1981-2010 of -3.24σ. Note that, during the period shown on the image, very little sunlight has reached the Southern Hemisphere. 

This spells bad news for Antarctic sea ice, which almost crossed the threshold for a Blue Ocean Event on February 22, 2023, as illustrated by the image below. 

[ image from earlier post, click to enlarge ]

In conclusion, a Blue Ocean Event could occur in the Southern Hemisphere in early 2026. This could be followed by a Blue Ocean Event in the Northern Hemisphere later in 2026, in particular if a new El Niño will emerge in the course of 2026 and further feedbacks are triggered, such as seafloor methane eruptions. 

The danger is also illustrated by the image below, adapted from an image issued by NOAA September 22, 2025, showing hourly methane averages recorded at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North.

Climate Emergency Declaration

The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group. 

Links

• Kevin Pluck - Sea ice visuals
https://seaice.visuals.earth

• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice thickness and volume
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Data Visualisation - flask and station methane measurements
https://gml.noaa.gov/dv/iadv

• Record high increase in carbon dioxide 

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/04/record-high-increase-in-carbon-dioxide.html

• Double Blue Ocean Event 2026?

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/09/double-blue-ocean-event-2026.html

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html

Arctic sea ice September 2025

The image below shows Arctic sea ice concentration on September 9, 2025. 

Over the years, the global monthly sea ice concentration has fallen significantly (compared to 1951-1980). The image below shows the global monthly sea ice concentration anomaly through August 2025. 

Albedo loss due to very low global sea ice area

The global sea ice area was 2.50 million km² below the 1981-2010 mean on September 10, 2025, a deviation from 1981-2010 of -4.32σ. 

The above image shows the situation through September 9, 2025. It is significant that the global sea ice area anomaly has been strongly negative this year, even despite the absence of an El Niño.

Sea ice decline can occur by reduction in the area covered by the sea ice, resulting in albedo loss. Sea ice decline can also occur as the sea ice darkens, which can occur due to melting, cracking and thinning of the ice, due to rain and meltwater forming pools on top of the ice, due to growth of algae and due to settling down of aerosols on the sea ice, all of which will also result in albedo loss.

Loss of sea ice area results in albedo loss, which means that less sunlight gets reflected back into space and more heat instead gets absorbed by the ocean.

[ image from earlier post ]

Arctic sea ice thickness and volume

Sea ice decline also occurs as a result of thinning of the sea ice. The image on the right shows Arctic sea ice thickness on September 11, 2025. 

Sea ice thickness can be hard to measure, due to rain and meltwater forming pools on top of the ice, while clouds can also obscure satellite imaging.

On the image below, adapted from dmi.dk, markers are added for September (red) and April (blue) corresponding with the year's minimum- and maximum volume, showing the downward path over the years for both the annual sea ice volume minimum and maximum. Magenta bars are added in years when the melting volume from April to September was large, while green bars are added in years when it was small. 

Arctic sea ice volume in April 2025 was about 19,000 km³, which raised fears that virtually all Arctic sea ice could disappear in September 2025, resulting in a Blue Ocean Event. 

Meanwhile, sea ice volume has fallen to about 4,000 km³ on September 12, 2025, as illustrated by the image below. Arctic sea ice volume was at a record low for the day on September 15, 2025, as it has been for more than a year. 

Why a Blue Ocean Event is so dangerous

PIOMAS estimates that 16,400 km³ of ice is lost every year (1979-2010 average) from April to September, consuming an amount of energy of 5 x 10²¹ Joules (the image on the right shows calculations, click on this link or on the image to enlarge).

Once the latent heat buffer is lost, further heat must go elsewhere. During the phase change from ice to water, the temperature doesn't rise, i.e. all the energy goes into the process of changing ice into water. Once all ice has melted, further heat will raise the temperature of the water. The amount of energy that is consumed in the process of melting the ice is as much as it takes to heat an equivalent mass of water from zero°C to 80°C. 

Decline of the snow and ice cover comes with numerous feedbacks, the loss of the latent heat buffer (feedback #14 on the feedbacks page) is only one of them. Further feedbacks include the loss of albedo (feedback #1), increases in emissions (feedback #2), loss of emissivity (feedback #23), while there are also changes to the Jet Stream (feedback #14) and changes to clouds and water vapor (feedback #20), and there are mechanisms and circumstances aggravating the danger, such as the slowdown of AMOC and further changes to ocean currents.

Eruption of methane from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean (feedback #16) is one of the most dangerous feedbacks. As the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean heats up, heat can penetrate sediments and cause destabilization of hydrates, resulting in eruption of methane. As the seas in the Arctic Ocean can be very shallow, the methane can erupt with force in the form of plumes, with little opportunity for the methane to get decomposed in the water. Furthermore, there is very little hydroxyl in the air over the Arctic, which extends the lifetime of methane over the Arctic.

[ The Buffer is gone, from Accelerating Temperature Rise ]

Sea ice constitutes a buffer that previously consumed much incoming ocean heat (left); as sea ice thins, the buffer disappears while more heat also enters the Arctic Ocean (right). Further heat entering the Arctic Ocean from the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean threatens to destabilize sediments that contain methane, causing eruption of huge amounts of methane.

The image below, adapted from an image issued by NOAA on September 16, 2025, shows hourly methane averages recorded at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North. 

The image below, adapted from Copernicus, shows a methane forecast for September 6, 2025 12:00, run that day at 00 UTC. High methane levels are visible on the West Coast of Canada, also discussed on facebook. 

The image below shows that the NOAA 21 satellite recorded methane levels as high as 2559 parts per billion (ppb) at 399.1 mb on September 6, 2025 AM.

High temperatures and ocean heat

In August 2025, high temperature anomalies (compared to 1951-1980) were recorded at both poles, as illustrated by the image below. 

The image below shows the NASA August 2025 temperature anomaly (versus 1951_1980). 

Ominously, the global temperature anomaly has gone up again recently, despite the current absence of an El Niño. The anomaly for August 2025 was 1.51°C above 1903-1912 (not pre-industrial), as illustrated by the image below. 

The image below shows temperature anomalies from 1951-1980 (NCEP/NCAR data). 

The image below shows sea surface temperature anomalies through August 2025 (ERA5 Data). 

The image below shows NASA land-only anomalies from 1880-1920 (not pre-industrial) through August 2025, when the anomaly was 1.82°C. The red line is a 3-year Lowess Smoothing trend. If this trend continued unchanged (dashed red), the anomaly could cross 3°C in 2029, causing mass extinction.

Note that when using a genuinely pre-industrial base, anomalies can be much higher than depicted in the above images. A 3°C anomaly constitutes an important threshold, since humans will likely go extinct with such a rise. As illustrated by the image below, the rise may already be more well over 2°C, while we may face a potentially huge temperature rise over the next few years.

[ from the post When will humans go extinct? ]

   [ from: When Will We Die? ]

Recent research led by David Fastivich finds that, historically, vegetation responded at timescales from hundreds to tens of thousands of years, but not at timescales shorter than about 150 years. It takes centuries for tree populations to adapt - far too slow to keep pace with today’s rapidly warming world.

Note that healthy vegetation relies not only on temperature, but also on the presence of good soil, microbes, rain, soil nutrients, pollinators, habitat, groundwater and an absence of toxic waste, pests and diseases.

A 2018 study by Strona & Bradshaw indicates that most life on Earth will disappear with a 5°C rise (see box on the right). Humans, who depend on a lot of other species, will likely go extinct with a 3°C, as discussed in the earlier post When Will We Die?

The image below shows Arctic air temperature through September 5, 2025, with the inset highlighting the Arctic and the global temperature anomaly that day. The temperature in the Arctic reached a daily record high of 2.4°C on September 5, 2025, an anomaly of +2.46°C compared to 1979-2000.

The image below shows sea surface temperatures in the Gulf through September 7, 2025, when the sea surface reached a record daily high temperature of an average of 30.84°C, an anomaly of +1.53°C compared to 1982-2010, with the inset highlighting the Gulf and the global sea surface temperature anomaly that day. 

The image below shows high Ocean Heat Content in the Gulf through September 7, 2025. 

Equivalent Ocean Heat Content on September 8, 2025, is illustrated in the image below. 

The temperature of the ocean is very high in many areas, as illustrated by the image below. The image below shows sea surface temperatures around North America as high as 33°C on September 1, 2025.

In conclusion, a lot of ocean heat is still on its way toward the Arctic Ocean along the path of the Gulf Stream. 

The Jet Stream is getting increasingly distorted, which threatens to - at times - speed up the flow of large amounts of heat into the Arctic Ocean. The image below shows the situation on September 10, 2025.

The image on the left shows the Jet Stream following the path of the Gulf Stream over the North Atlantic, with one branch going south and moving backward, while another branch is moving North over the Arctic Ocean, with both branches displaying circular patterns. 

The image on the right shows the Jet Stream reaching speeds over the Arctic Ocean as high as 253 km/h with wind power density as high as 67.9 kW/m² (at the green circle). 

Land Evaporation Tipping Point

Higher temperatures come with stronger feedbacks, such as stronger evaporation resulting in both a lot more water vapor and a lot more heat getting transferred from the surface to the atmosphere. Much of this will return to the surface with precipitation such as rain and snow, but 7% more water vapor will end up in the atmosphere for every degree Celsius rise in temperature. Moreover, water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas that will increase temperatures and it is a self-amplifying feedback that can strongly contribute to further acceleration of the temperature rise.

Precipitable water can be expressed in kg/m² or in millimeters (mm), with the latter representing the depth of the water if all the atmospheric vapor were condensed into liquid form and spread across the surface, while kilograms per square meter (kg/m²) represents the mass of that water per unit area (1 kg/m² = 1 mm). As illustrated by the image below, the monthly precipitable water anomaly (in kg/m², versus 1951-1980) has increased over time, in line with rising temperatures. 

At the same time, the monthly total precipitation anomaly (versus 1951-1980) has decreased over time, as illustrated by the image below. 

This decrease in precipitation indicates that over time, less and less evaporation is taking place over land, in turn indicating that the Land Evaporation Tipping Point is getting crossed in areas where water is no longer available locally for further evapotranspiration, i.e. from all processes by which water moves from the land surface to the atmosphere via evaporation and transpiration, including transpiration from vegetation, evaporation from the soil surface, from the capillary fringe of the groundwater table, and from water bodies on land, as also discussed at this page and at this article on the Water Vapor-Pressure Deficit (VPD).

Once this tipping point gets crossed, the land and atmosphere will heat up strongly. Additionally, more water vapor in the atmosphere accelerates the temperature rise, since water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas and this also contributes to speeding up the temperature rise of the atmosphere (as also discussed on facebook here, here and here).

The image below, adapted from Copernicus, shows the global fall in relative humidity over land over time. 

[ image from Moistening Atmosphere ]

Climate Emergency Declaration

The temperature rise is accelerating and the rise could accelerate even more due to decreases in buffers (as described in earlier posts such as this one), due to strengthening feedbacks, especially during an El Niño, and due to further reduction of the aerosol masking effect, which are all developments that could rapidly speed up existing feedbacks and trigger new feedbacks.

The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group.

Links

• University of Bremen - sea ice concentration and thickness

https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/start

• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice thickness and volume
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• PIOMAS - Arctic Sea Ice Volume Reanalysis 

https://psc.apl.uw.edu/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly

• Climate  Reanalyzer

https://climatereanalyzer.org

• Kevin Pluck - Sea ice visuals
https://seaice.visuals.earth

• NOAA - sea surface temperatures
https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/products/ocean/sst/contour/index.html

Also discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10172670654340161&set=p.10172670654340161

• University of Miami - Rosenstiel School - North Atlantic OHC
https://isotherm.rsmas.miami.edu/heat/weba/atlantic.php

• Brian McNoldy - Ocean Heat Content
https://bmcnoldy.earth.miami.edu/tropics/ohc
discussed on Facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163172734849679

• NOAA - Climate Prediction Center - ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Data Visualisation - flask and station methane measurements

https://gml.noaa.gov/dv/iadv

• When Will We Die?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2019/06/when-will-we-die.html 

• Copernicus

https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu

also discussed on facebook at: 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163179340334679

• ECMWF - El Niño forecast
https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_nino_annual_plumes

• nullschool.net

https://earth.nullschool.net

• When will humans go extinct?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/02/when-will-humans-go-extinct.html

• Coupled, decoupled, and abrupt responses of vegetation to climate across timescales - by David Fastovich et al. (2025)
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adr6700
discussed on Facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10162972980774679

• Arctic Blue Ocean Event 2025?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/03/arctic-blue-ocean-event-2025.html

• Arctic Blue Ocean Event 2025? (update June 2025)

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/06/arctic-blue-ocean-event-2025-update-June-2025.html

• Arctic Blue Ocean Event? (update July 2025) 
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/07/arctic-blue-ocean-event-update-july-2025.html

• Blue Ocean Event

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/blue-ocean-event.html

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html