[ click on images to enlarge ] |
The above image shows Arctic sea ice extent from November 5 to December 24, a period when Arctic sea ice is growing in extent. The red line shows 2024 sea ice extent through November 23, 2024. Dots mark Arctic sea ice extent on November 23 for the respective year. On November 23, Arctic sea ice extent was lower only in 2016, which is worrying, since El Niño conditions were dominant in 2016, whereas La Niña conditions are now dominant.
The current La Niña is predicted to be weak and short-lived, as illustrated by the image below, from NOAA.
The image below shows NOAA monthly temperature anomalies versus El Niño through October 2024.
The image below shows Antarctic sea ice extent during the months September and October, highlighting extent in 2023 and 2024, as compared to extent averages in previous decades.
As illustrated by the above image, Antarctic sea ice extent in September and October 2023 & 2024 was much lower than in previous decades, a huge difference that occurred during a period when little or no sunlight was reaching Antarctic sea ice. On November 9, 2024, Antarctic sea ice extent was 14.99 million km², a record low for the time of year.
Global sea ice typically reaches its annual maximum extent around this time of year, as Arctic sea ice expands in extent. On November 9, 2024, global sea ice extent was 23.34 million km², a record low for the time of year and well below the 24.15 million km² on November 9, 2023.
Higher ocean heat in combination with higher air temperatures over the Arctic Ocean are two drivers behind the slow growth in Arctic sea ice extent, which is in turn keeping global sea ice extent low.
The above compilation of four images by the University of Bremen illustrates the decline in Antarctic sea ice thickness from August 27, 2024, to November 22, 2024.
A recent study argues that existing estimates of ocean temperatures for the period 1900–1930 are too cold. When adjusting ocean data upward, the anomaly compared to this period would come down, so in order not to downplay the temperature rise, it's important to put this into perspective.
As the image below shows, differences between ocean and land data for the period 1880-1898 are even larger, which is important since the period 1880-1898 is part of the period that the IPCC has selected as pre-industrial base.
While adjusting ocean data for 1921-1943 makes sense, it is even more important to use the most appropriate base as pre-industrial and to adjust the temperature rise from pre-industrial accordingly. When using a genuinely pre-industrial base, anomalies such as the above-mentioned 1.89°C for February 2024 will exceed 2°C, as discussed at the pre-industrial page.
Historic rise: more than 1.5°C above 1903-1924 for 16 consecutive months
The above image, created with NASA data through October 2024 while using a 1903-1924 custom base, illustrates that the monthly temperature anomaly has been more than 1.5°C above this base for 16 consecutive months (from July 2023 through October 2024). The red line shows a trend (2-year Lowess Smoothing) associated with recent data and the trend indicates that the anomaly is rising.
How appropriate is the use of a 1903-1924 base? Using a different base can make a lot of difference. As illustrated by the image below, the temperature anomaly for February 2024 can be as high as 1.89°C when using a 1904-1911 base.
How appropriate is the use of a 1903-1924 base? Using a different base can make a lot of difference. As illustrated by the image below, the temperature anomaly for February 2024 can be as high as 1.89°C when using a 1904-1911 base.
A recent study argues that existing estimates of ocean temperatures for the period 1900–1930 are too cold. When adjusting ocean data upward, the anomaly compared to this period would come down, so in order not to downplay the temperature rise, it's important to put this into perspective.
As the image below shows, differences between ocean and land data for the period 1880-1898 are even larger, which is important since the period 1880-1898 is part of the period that the IPCC has selected as pre-industrial base.
While adjusting ocean data for 1921-1943 makes sense, it is even more important to use the most appropriate base as pre-industrial and to adjust the temperature rise from pre-industrial accordingly. When using a genuinely pre-industrial base, anomalies such as the above-mentioned 1.89°C for February 2024 will exceed 2°C, as discussed at the pre-industrial page.
The map on the right with October 2024 temperature anomalies from 1951-1980 based on NCEP data shows high polar anomalies.
Similarly, the map below with October 2024 temperature anomalies from 1951-1980 based on ERA5 data shows high polar anomalies.
The 1951-1980 base for the maps is NASA's default base, but neither 1951-1980 nor the above 1903-1924 is pre-industrial. As said, anomalies from a pre-industrial base are higher.
The rise to come
The image below shows temperature anomalies versus 1991-2020 from early 2023 through November 23, 2024. Trends added to the ERA5 data show that the anomaly has been rising for almost 18 consecutive months, i.e. since the start of El Niño (June 2023, pink shading), during ENSO-neutral conditions (from May 2024, blue shading) and into La Niña (from October 2024, also blue shading).
Self-amplifying feedbacks, crossing of tipping points and further developments (such as loss of the aerosol masking effect) can all contribute to further accelerate the temperature rise through 2026, resulting in a rise from pre-industrial of more than 10°C, while in the process causing the clouds tipping point to get crossed that can push up the temperature rise by a further 8°C, as discussed in earlier posts such as this one.
Jet Stream distortion
As a result of the narrowing temperature difference between the Arctic and the Tropics, the Jet Stream gets distorted. The image below shows a distorted Jet Stream (250 hPa) over the North Atlantic on November 11, 2024.
As a result of the narrowing temperature difference between the Arctic and the Tropics, the Jet Stream gets distorted. The image below shows a distorted Jet Stream (250 hPa) over the North Atlantic on November 11, 2024.
Precipitation
The image below shows an atmospheric river stretched out over the North Atlantic from the Tropics to the Arctic with high rainfall over the North Atlantic and snowfall over Greenland on November 11, 2024.
Water vapor
The image below shows a forecast for November 12, 2024, with precipitable water anomalies at the high end of the scale over the Arctic Ocean.
Feedbacks
The image below illustrates how multiple feedbacks can interact and jointly contribute to further acceleration of the temperature rise.
[ from earlier post ] |
There are many feedbacks and other mechanisms active and they are interacting on top of driving up temperatures individually.
Albedo change is a feedback that can have a huge impact. The currently very low global sea ice extent is a self-reinforcing feedback, as it results in less sunlight getting reflected back into space and more heat getting absorbed by oceans.
Extra water vapor is another self-reinfocing feedback, since water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas.
These are just some of the feedbacks that can contribute to further acceleration of the temperature rise, as discussed in an earlier post.
Extra water vapor is another self-reinfocing feedback, since water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas.
These are just some of the feedbacks that can contribute to further acceleration of the temperature rise, as discussed in an earlier post.
Carbon dioxide keeps rising
The above image shows carbon dioxide on November 12, 2024 - forecast for 03 UTC by Copernicus. The graph at the bottom of the image shows monthly carbon dioxide exceeding 425 ppb in October 2024 at Mauna Lao, Hawaii, based on NOAA data with trend added.
The images on the right, adapted from Climate Reanalyzer, shows the total precipitation standardized anomaly over the past few years. The top image shows the anomaly in Brazil. The image underneath on the right shows the anomaly in Africa.
In many places, what were previously carbon sinks have turned into sources of carbon emissions.
[ click on images to enlarge ] |
Climate Emergency Declaration
The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group.
Links
• National Institute of Polar Research Japan
https://ads.nipr.ac.jp
• NOAA - Climate Prediction Center - 14 November 2024
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso_advisory/ensodisc.html
also discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10162003805269679
• NOAA - Monthly Temperature Anomalies Versus El Niño
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202410/supplemental/page-4
• NSIDC - Interactive sea ice chart
https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph
• University of Bremen - sea ice
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10162003805269679
• NOAA - Monthly Temperature Anomalies Versus El Niño
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202410/supplemental/page-4
• NSIDC - Interactive sea ice chart
https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph
• University of Bremen - sea ice
also discussed on facebook at:
• Early-twentieth-century cold bias in ocean surface temperature observations - by Sebastian Sippel et al.
discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10161956156144679
• pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html
• Climate Reanalyzer
https://climatereanalyzer.org
• Copernicus
https://climate.copernicus.eu
• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Gases, trends in CO2
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends
also discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10161904718934679
https://www.facebook.com/SamCarana/posts/10169996053330161
• Sunspots
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/sunspots.html
• Feedbacks in the Arctic
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/feedbacks.html
• Jet Stream
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/jet-stream.html
• Pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html
• The Clouds Feedback and the Clouds Tipping Point
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/clouds-feedback.html
• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html
• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html
• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10161956156144679
• pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html
• Climate Reanalyzer
https://climatereanalyzer.org
• Copernicus
https://climate.copernicus.eu
• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Gases, trends in CO2
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends
also discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10161904718934679
https://www.facebook.com/SamCarana/posts/10169996053330161
• Sunspots
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/sunspots.html
• Feedbacks in the Arctic
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/feedbacks.html
• Jet Stream
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/jet-stream.html
• Pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html
• The Clouds Feedback and the Clouds Tipping Point
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/clouds-feedback.html
• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html
• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html
• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html