The situation is dire. Little or no action is taken on climate change. Earth is facing a potential temperature rise of 18°C or 32.4°F by 2026. What is happening in the Arctic is critical. While Earth as a whole is experiencing rapid warming, warming in the Arctic is escalating even faster and accelerating, due to feedbacks such as snow and ice demise and destabilizing sediments at seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. These sediments contain huge amounts of methane in the form of hydrates and free gas.
|Potential temperature rise of 18°C or 32.4°F by 2026 (see this post and the extinction page)|
The green lines of action each need to be implemented in parallel, i.e. no line of action should wait for another, nor should action on one line be used as an excuse to delay action on another line. While lines of action are grouped together in four parts, the number of each part merely shows how action should line up with specific kinds of warming, as pictured at the top of the image.
The image below highlights the comprehensive and effective action that needs to be taken immediately.
The Climate Plan contains four parts, differentiated in above image by background color, where action is to be implemented immediately:
- Sustainable Economy, i.e. moving toward a more sustainable economy, with dramatic reductions of pollutants on land, in oceans and in the atmosphere
- Heat management
- Atmospheric management
|[ click on images to enlarge ]|
As an example, differential rates applied by local councils to land ownership can facilitate growth of soil carbon content. Similarly, differential vehicle registration fees can facilitate emission cuts. Such measures can typically be implemented now, i.e. without requiring prior international agreement. In other words, local communities can start implementing (parts of) the Climate Plan immediately.
While feebates are recommended as the most effective policy instruments, the decision how to implement the necessary action (e.g. efforts to reduce pollution levels) is largely delegated to state or provincial level, while states or provinces can similarly delegate decisions to local communities. Examples of feebate policies are depicted in the image below.
|[ from an earlier post ]|
States or provinces can thus implement the policies that they feel will fit their circumstances best, provided they do each achieve their targets. Such targets are set by national government in line with international agreements, and assisted by ongoing monitoring and research as to which ways can best make safe progress and achieve targets most effectively.
Local implementation encourages that revenues from fees on polluting products are used to fund the necessary shift to clean products locally. This will help achieve the shift where it’s needed most.
The two above images above depict energy feebates and other feebates. Energy feebates can best clean up energy, while other feebates can best raise revenue for carbon dioxide removal and further action. Energy feebates can phase themselves out, completing the necessary shift to clean energy within years, rather than decades. Since carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will need to continue for longer, it makes sense to raise funding for CDR from other sources, such as sales of livestock products, nitrogen fertilizers and Portland cement.
Please support, follow and discuss the Climate Plan at facebook.com/ClimatePlan and at facebook.com/SamCarana
Groups to discuss things further and see news and updates:
• Electric Transport
• Climate Alert
• Climate Plan
• Albedo Change in Arctic
• How much warming have humans caused?
• Storms over Arctic Ocean
• Sea ice is shrinking
• Monthly CO₂ not under 400 ppm in 2016
• It could be unbearably hot in many places within a few years time