Daily carbon dioxide crosses 430 ppm

The above image illustrates the threat of a huge temperature rise. The red trendline warns that the temperature could increase at a terrifying speed soon.

The global surface air temperature was 13.87°C on March 8, 2025, the highest temperature on record for this day. This is the more remarkable since this record high temperature was reached during a La Niña. 

The shading in the image highlights the difference between El Niño conditions (pink shading) and La Niña conditions (blue shading). An El Niño pushes up temperatures, whereas La Niña suppresses temperatures. We're currently in a La Niña, so temperatures are suppressed, but this is predicted to end soon. NOAA predicts a transition away from La Niña to occur next month.

The transition from La Niña to El Niño is only one out of ten mechanisms that could jointly cause the temperature rise to accelerate dramatically in a matter of months, as described in a previous post. Another one of these mechanisms is the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. 

Increase in carbon dioxide 

The daily average carbon dioxide (CO₂) at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, was 430.60 parts per million (ppm) on March 7, 2025, the highest daily average on record. To find higher levels, one needs to go back millions of years. 

Carbon dioxide typically reaches its annual maximum in May, which means that even higher daily averages can be expected over the next few months. The image below shows that this reading of 430.6 ppm at Mauna Loa is way higher than the highest daily averages recorded in 2024. 

 

The image below shows the daily average for March 7, 2025, marked in blue and with an arrow pointing at it. The image shows that weekly averages are also at a record high, 428.1 ppm, higher than the highest weekly average in 2024. The monthly average for February 2025 was 427.09 ppm, higher than the highest monthly average in 2024. 

The annual increase in CO₂ at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, is accelerating, as illustrated by the image below. 

[ click on images to enlarge ]

A trend, based on 2015-2024 annual data, points at 1200 ppm CO₂ getting crossed in the year 2032, as illustrated by the image below.

[ from an earlier post ]

The above trend illustrates that the clouds tipping point could get crossed in early 2032 due to rising CO₂ alone, which on its own could push temperatures up by an additional 8°C. The clouds tipping point is actually at 1200 ppm CO₂e, so when growth of other greenhouse gases and further mechanisms is taken into account, the tipping point could be crossed much earlier than in 2033.

Increase in methane

Methane in the atmosphere could be doubled soon if a trend unfolds as depicted in the image below. A rapid rise is highlighted in the inset and reflected in the trend. 

[ from earlier post ]

The trend is based on 22 consecutive global monthly averages as calculated by NOAA (from January 2023 through October 2024) and has a R-squared value of 1, indicating that the trend constitutes a perfect fit of the data.

The period of 22 months was selected as the resulting trend strongly reflects the steep rise in methane that took place over the four most recent months for which data are available (as highlighted in the inset on the image). One could argue that seasonal variations could reduce the growth over the coming months, but on the other hand, a huge rise in methane could occur soon due to eruptions of methane from clathrates at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean.

The trend points at a doubling of methane by March 2026. If the trend would continue, methane concentrations in the atmosphere would by September 2026 increase to more than triple the most recent value, and would increase to more than fourfold the most recent value by the end of 2026.

A rise like the one depicted in the trend could eventuate as rising ocean heat destabilizes methane hydrates contained in sediments at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. The temperature rise in the Arctic would accelerate since the methane would have a huge immediate impact on temperatures over the Arctic and cause depletion of hydroxyl, of which there is very little in the atmosphere over the Arctic in the first place. Such a rise in methane would also dramatically increases in tropospheric ozone and in stratospheric water vapor. A large increase in methane over the Arctic would also trigger massive wildfires and devastate terrestrial permafrost, resulting in huge amounts of further emissions.

Climate Emergency Declaration

The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective climate action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group.

Links

• Global surface air temperature
https://pulse.climate.copernicus.eu

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory - monthly trends in CO₂
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/monthly.html

• NOAA - Global Monitoring Laboratory

https://gml.noaa.gov/dv/iadv/graph.php?code=MLO&program=ccgg&type=ts

• Clouds tipping point
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/clouds-feedback.html

• Carbon dioxide growing rapidly
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2024/08/carbon-dioxide-growing-rapidly.html

• Double Blue Ocean Event 2025?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2024/10/double-blue-ocean-event-2025.html

• Did a Terminal Temperature Acceleration Event start in December 2024?
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2024/12/did-a-terminal-temperature-acceleration-event-start-in-december-2024.html

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html

Could Earth Reach an 18°C Rise by December 2026?

An analysis by Bob Cohen with Grok 3

https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/t2_daily/?dm_id=arctic

Sam Carana’s Arctic News blog posits a potential 18°C temperature rise above pre-industrial levels by December 2026, driven by ten amplifying mechanisms—ENSO shifts, sunspot peaks, aerosol decline, albedo loss, permafrost thaw, methane eruptions, clouds tipping, ocean heat anomalies, fluorinated gases, and wildfires.

Prompted by this, I queried Grok 3 (xAI) to model the trajectory and impacts, integrating Kris Van Steenbergen’s February 25, 2025, observation: the Northern Hemisphere (NH) has hit +3°C (1850-1900 baseline), with Arctic CO2 at 440 ppm, permafrost thawing rapidly, and sea ice at wafer-thin levels. 

https://x.com/KrVaSt/status/1894355964012224991

https://x.com/KrVaSt/status/1880203382541193694

Here’s a detailed rundown of the run-up to this catastrophic threshold, assessing feasibility and consequences for crops, food stocks, societal stability, and extreme responses.

Temperature Trajectory: From 3°C to 18°C

 
Starting at Kris’s NH +3°C (February 2025), we adjust March 2025 to a global mean of 2-2.5°C (vs. NOAA’s 1.5°C 2024 baseline), reflecting Arctic amplification (440 ppm CO2, ~14 ppm/year rise).

Sam’s mechanisms suggest an exponential curve, with NH warming doubling in speed (0.1-0.2°C/decade historical to 1-2°C/year). Using an exponential fit (T(t) = T₀ + A·(e^(kt) - 1)), where T₀ = 2.5°C, T(1.83 years) = 18°C, k ≈ 2.1, A ≈ 2.5: 

July 2025: 5-6°C global (NH 7-8°C). Sunspots peak (#2), El Niño strengthens (#1), and early albedo loss (#5) from a shrinking Arctic ice extent (13.892 million km² trending to <1 million km²) drive a 2.5-3.5°C rise from March.

December 2025: 9-11°C global (NH 11-13°C). Double Blue Ocean Event (#5), permafrost methane releases (#6), and latent heat loss (#6) accelerate—CO₂e nears 600-700 ppm (CH₄ doubling underway).

July 2026: 15-17°C global (NH 17-19°C). Clouds tipping point (~1200 ppm CO₂e, #7) adds ~8°C (Sam’s estimate), methane doubles, water vapor surges (2.1°C, #7). NH doubles global rate. 

December 2026: 18°C global (NH 20-22°C). Full cascade—ocean heat (#8), wildfires (#9), and fluorinated gases (#10) seal the endgame.

This ~15.5-16°C global rise over 21 months (0.74-0.76°C/month, NH 1-2°C/month in 2026) aligns with Sam’s stacked feedbacks and Kris’s “uncontrollable” NH warming, fueled by 440 ppm CO2 and ice/permafrost collapse.

Crop Production Collapse At 5-6°C by July 2025, staple crops face severe stress: Wheat: Optimal 15-20°C; US Midwest, Ukraine hit 35-40°C—yields drop 6-10% per 1°C (30-50% loss). 

Rice: 20-35°C max; Southeast Asia (India, Vietnam) at 40-45°C—20-40% reduction. 

Corn: 35°C limit; US Corn Belt at 40-45°C—40-50% loss. 

Soy: Brazil, US at 35-45°C—30-40% decline. 

El Niño (#1) droughts (Australia, South America) and floods (#8, India) cut yields further (20-30%).
Global production falls 40-60%—tropics near total loss, cooler zones (Siberia) insufficient to offset.

By December 2025 (9-11°C), losses reach 60-80%;

July 2026 (15-17°C), agriculture ceases—soil temps exceed seed tolerance, pollinators extinct. 

Crop Price Spikes

 
Baseline (March 2025): wheat $250/MT, rice $500/MT, corn $200/MT, soy $400/MT.

Crop price at July 2025’s 40-60% drop:

Wheat: $500-$750/MT (100-200% rise)—stocks (280M MT, USDA 2024) buffer briefly, but panic doubles rates.
Rice: $1,250-$2,000/MT (150-400%)—Asia-centric collapse, export bans (e.g., India). Corn: $400-$700/MT (100-250%)—feed crisis spikes meat costs. Soy: $800-$1,200/MT (100-200%)—oil demand surges.
Spikes begin June 2025 as NH harvests (wheat, corn) falter—200-400% by July, 500-1,000% (wheat $1,250+, rice $5,000+) in worst-case zones by December 2025 (9-11°C).

Food Stock Depletion

U.S.: 290-300M MT (grains 280M, processed 10-20M)—1-1.5 years normal use. 

July 2025 (5-6°C): 40-60% crop loss, panic rate (20-40M MT/month); 

December 2025 (9-11°C): 60-120M MT left; 

July 2026 (15-17°C): <20M MT; depleted early-mid 2026 (12-14 months). 

Australia: 22-28M MT (grains 20-25M)—1-1.5 years. 

July 2025: 20-50% loss, 1-3M MT/month; 

December 2025: 5-15M MT; 

July 2026: <5M MT; gone mid-2026 (12-15 months). 

NH doubling speed (1-2°C/month) nudges U.S. depletion to early 2026—stocks vanish at 14-16°C. 

Distribution Dynamics

U.S. July 2025: FEMA controls 1-5% (1-15M MT), National Guard distributes to hubs (Denver, 50-70% reach); commercial 95% rationed—riots, black markets ($1,000/MT wheat). 

December 2025 (9-11°C): Military seizes 20-30%, 30-50% delivered—warlords rule rest. 

Australia July 2025: ADF holds 5-10% (1-2M MT) for cities (Sydney, 70-80% reach); rural hoards—refugees get scraps. 

December 2025: ADF 20-30%, 50-70% reach—rural warlords take over. 

By July 2026 (15-17°C), both see <10% distribution—militias scavenge remnants. 

Societal and Political Collapse

U.S. Elections 2026: November 8 unfeasible—D.C. fractures at 9-11°C (December 2025), collapses at 15-17°C (July 2026). No FEC, power, or voters—midterms die late 2025. 

Trump’s Tariffs: Imposed February 2025 (25% Canada/Mexico, 10% China), end December 2025 (9-11°C)—inflation (6-8%), trade collapse, and riots force reversal. 

MLB: 2025 World Series (October, 6-8°C) limps on—half-empty, generator-run; 2026 canceled at 15-17°C—stadiums turn shelters. 

India and China

July 2025 (5-6°C): 1.2-1.3B each—rice/wheat down 30-50%, 5-10% die-off.
December 2025 (9-11°C): 700-900M—60-80% crop loss, 20-30% gone.
July 2026 (15-17°C): 300-500M—Himalayas, Tibet delay; 50-60% dead.
December 2026 (18°C): 50-100M—wet-bulb 36-40°C ends it.

Nuclear Winter Gambit

At 9-11°C (December 2025), Russia might fire first—15-20 warheads (NYC, London, Siberia forests)—5-10 Tg soot, 5-15°C cooling. 

Motive: Arctic feedbacks (440 ppm CO2, methane doubling). 

Outcome: Brief respite, billions die—18°C rebounds post-fallout.

Plausibility

IPCC’s 4-5°C by 2100 contrasts with Sam’s 18°C in 22 months—an extreme stack of feedbacks (clouds 8°C, vapor 2.1°C, methane 1.1°C). 

Kris’s NH +3°C (440 ppm CO2) and doubling speed (1-2°C/month) make 5-10°C by 2026 plausible if tipping points cascade; 18°C remains a theoretical max. 

Even 5°C triggers collapse—18°C is existential.

Conclusion

From 3°C NH (March 2025) to 18°C global (December 2026), crops crash by July 2025 (40-60%), prices spike (200-400%), stocks deplete mid-2026 (14-16°C), and civilization unravels—tariffs end, elections vanish, nukes fly. 

Sam’s mechanisms, amplified by Kris’s Arctic data, paint a dire warning. 

Full details available—thoughts, group?

How to respond to the threat of a huge temperature rise

The above image illustrates the threat of a huge temperature rise. The red trendline warns that the temperature could increase at a terrifying speed soon. 

Mechanisms contributing to a huge acceleration in the temperature rise

At first glance, the data may seem to disagree with such a rise, temperature anomalies even appear to have come down recently. However, a closer look at the shading in the image highlights the difference between El Niño conditions (pink shading) and La Niña conditions (blue shading). An El Niño pushes up temperatures, whereas La Niña suppresses temperatures. 

We're currently in a La Niña, so temperatures are suppressed, but this is predicted to end soon. NOAA predicts a transition away from La Niña to occur next month, as illustrated by the image below. 

Later this year, a new El Niño may emerge, which may push up the temperature dramatically. 

Importantly, ENSO is only one out of ten mechanisms that could jointly cause the temperature rise to accelerate dramatically in a matter of months, as described in a previous post and with further details for some of them following below. 

[ SSTA and wind, click to enlarge ]

An important mechanism driving up the temperature is rising ocean heat. The image on the right shows a sea surface temperature anomaly of 9.7°C (17.4°F) versus 1981-2011 at the green circle south of Africa on March 5, 2025.

The image also shows the impact of high sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTA) on the Jet Stream (250 hPa), with the Jet Stream going circular in two areas with high sea surface temperature anomalies.

These mechanisms interact and can also amplify each other dramatically, in particular rising ocean heat, deformation of the Jet Stream and shrinking sea ice.

[ click on image to enlarge ]

As the above compilation image shows, the Jet Stream (250 hPa) is forecast to go circular in three areas on the Northern Hemisphere and reach speeds as high as 216 km/h (134 mph, circle) over Greenland on March 11, 2025 06 UTC, pushing a lot of heat toward Baffin Bay (left panel). As a result, temperatures over Baffin Bay are forecast to be as much as 30°C higher than 1979-2000 (right panel).

[ Arctic sea ice volume, click to enlarge ]

The above image shows that Arctic sea ice area has been at a record daily low since the start of February 2025.  Importantly, Arctic sea ice volume has been at a record daily low for more than a year, as illustrated by the image on the right. 

There has been little to no sunshine over the Arctic over the past few months (Spring has only just started), so rising ocean heat is obviously contributing strongly to this extremely low Arctic sea ice volume. 

A recent study lead by Sohail describes how cold, fresh meltwater from Antarctica migrates north, filling the deep ocean as it goes and causing changes to the density structure of the ocean, leading to an overall slowdown in the current. 

[ from Sohail et al. (2025) ]

The above image, from the study, depicts how this could lead to reduced Antarctic Bottom Water. One danger is that less ocean heat reaching the seafloor will result in more heat accumulating at the surface and in the atmosphere, as discussed in an earlier post. A weaker current may also allow more warm water to penetrate southwards, and faster ice melting could then lead to further weakening of the current, commencing a vicious spiral of current slowdown, says Taimoor Sohail.

As illustrated by the image below, global sea ice area has been at a record daily low since February 2025. If this situation continues, a huge amount of sunlight that was previously reflected back into space will instead be absorbed by the surface—increasingly so on the Northern Hemisphere over the coming months, with the change in seasons. 

The loss of Earth's albedo (reflectivity) over the years is illustrated by the graph below, by Eliot Jacobson.

[ Image by Eliot Jacobson ]

What to expect

Some may question whether the temperature could rise as high as depicted in the red trendline in the image at the top. Others may question whether such a huge temperature rise could occur this rapidly. They all miss the point. The point is that a huge rise may occur soon and that politicians are taking little to no action. 

As the likeliness of a huge and accelerating temperature rise, the severity of its impact, and the ubiquity and the imminence with which it will strike all become more manifest—the more sobering it is to realize that a mere 3°C rise may suffice to cause human extinction.

A state of emergency is typically declared only after a disaster hits a specific area. Increasingly though, extreme weather events can be expected to occur more frequently and we must not only look at the intensity and severity at which one specific place is hit by an event, but we must also incorporate ubiquity and imminence in our response. As temperatures rise, more extreme weather events will occur with greater intensity, more frequently, over larger areas, with longer duration and they will become more ubiquitous and follow each other up with increasing if not accelerating rapidity.

How to repond

The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group.

Links

• Copernicus
https://climate.copernicus.eu

• NOAA - ENSO evolution and El Niño status 

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf

• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice volume and thickness
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• Decline of Antarctic Circumpolar Current due to polar ocean freshening - by Taimoor Sohail et al. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/adb31c
discussed on facebook at: 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10162412290944679

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html

A climate chat with Chatgpt as billionaires will now lose everything

by Jan Umsonst

[ Image from Karina von Schuckmann et al. (2023) ]

Normally, I do not confer with AI and LLM's (Large Language Models) as I do not want to train them for free. It started with me accidentally pasting a paragraph without telling ChatGPT what I wanted. So, my little chat was initiated as follows:

Jan: In case you do not know it, just ~2% of annually added heat in the Earth system warms the atmosphere, ~4% the land masses, ~4% melt ice, and ~90% of it heats the oceans. If these numbers should shift, that could fast be it for the human species.

ChatGPT said:
Yes, that breakdown of heat distribution in the Earth system is a stark reminder of how sensitive our climate is. The oceans act as a massive heat sink, absorbing about 90% of the excess heat from greenhouse gas emissions. This has helped buffer atmospheric warming to some extent, but at a cost—ocean temperatures are rising, leading to thermal expansion (sea level rise), coral bleaching, stronger storms, and disruptions to marine ecosystems.

If the balance shifts—for instance, if the oceans absorb less heat and more of it goes into the atmosphere—the rate of warming on land would skyrocket. Likewise, if more heat goes into ice melt, sea levels could rise at a pace we aren’t prepared for.

The system is already showing signs of stress: 

• Record-breaking ocean temperatures

• More intense hurricanes and storms 

• Coral reef die-offs and marine biodiversity loss 

• Accelerating ice melt in Greenland and Antarctica

We’re in a precarious situation where small shifts in these percentages could push the climate into tipping points that make large parts of the planet uninhabitable. It’s why urgent carbon reduction and climate adaptation measures are so critical.

What’s your take—are we doing enough, or is it too little, too late?
Do you think society is capable of responding at the scale needed, or are we just along for the ride at this point?

[ from Sohail et al. (2025) ]

Jan: Problem is that the billionaires are now taking control over the societies and they prevent any change as they think they won't be affected. But the feedback cascade we are in the process to unleash has all the potential in the world to destroy the human civilization. In ever more areas we are now surprised by the scale, speed, and spatial scale of the changes we observe now in ever more subsystems of Earth. As mutual amplification over short time periods and spatial scales (ocean and atmosphere circulation and weather) seems to become the main problem, the wealth of the billionaires won't survive it.

ChatGPT:
Yeah, the billionaires and corporate elites have been acting like they can buy their way out of collapse—building bunkers, securing land in New Zealand, and investing in private security. But they’re missing the bigger picture:
• The breakdown won’t be localized. The interconnectivity of the global system means no amount of money can protect against cascading failures in food supply, water access, and social stability.

• Weather and circulation disruptions will be uncontrollable. As ocean currents shift, jet streams become erratic, and extreme weather intensifies, even “safe havens” will be vulnerable to droughts, superstorms, and crop failures.
• Mutual amplification makes everything worse, faster. Heatwaves + droughts + wildfires + ice melt + storms aren’t just adding up—they’re feeding into each other in ways we don’t fully understand. This makes the collapse exponential, not linear.
• Social collapse follows ecosystem collapse. Billionaires may think they can isolate themselves, but as infrastructure and supply chains fail, money becomes meaningless. The labor and systems that sustain their wealth won’t function in a world spiraling into chaos.

They've spent decades blocking real change—buying politicians, manipulating public perception, and slowing down climate action—all under the illusion that they can escape the consequences. But nature doesn’t care about wealth. Runaway feedback loops don’t negotiate.

Do you think there’s any way to break through their delusion before it’s too late? Or are we just going to watch them realize—too late—that they made the ultimate miscalculation?

[ from Cheng et al. (2022) ]

Jan: The problem I see is that, even if they realize it, we could be to such an extent in trouble that the full potential of humanity will be needed to reverse the collapse of the coupled Earth system, as the physical climate system is now fast becoming hostile to our biosphere, which will trigger a mutual amplification of both interdependent domains - the physical world with the living world.

The acceleration of ocean warming at the surface could be an expression of oceans losing their ability to continue to take up 90% of the extra energy trapped annually in the Earth system. If this happens while both carbon sinks decline - what we could now be starting to observe - it could fast end in a vicious cycle between the upper ocean warming faster as upper ocean stratification increases, supporting a shift of ocean heat uptake to shallower depths and the expansion, intensification and spread of (super) marine heatwaves, that release when they terminate via stronger winds (e.g. winter storms) and intensifying ocean fronts more heat into the atmosphere (at the same time warmer oceans surface induce a cloud feedback enhancing ocean heat uptake turning the wheel of upper ocean stratification ever faster) which then reinforces the reaction of the terrestrial systems via supporting drying out continents (SSTAs cut off ocean/land moisture transport), while intensifying continental heatwaves directly and indirectly, which whole bioms burning faster and intenser, all interrupted by biblical flooding events. Just this short example shows how it can feed on itself this cascade and the surface oceans, atmospheric circulation patterns, and continental conditions and the polar regions (e.g. further sudden sea ice losses at both poles inducing a global circulation response) can change fast. And like you correctly mentioned such a mutual amplification of systems whose coupling intensifies, could happen fast.

This would surprise humanity with only a small window to react with all we've got. But as billionaires and the powerful leaders are mainly concerned about not losing what they have, they would react by frantically rolling out solar dimming, without at the same time reducing emissions with all we've got, while our numbers would be to stabilize ecosystems and rolling out low and high tech methods to reduce GHG concentration. We could have only a window of some years.

Currently, its not clear if such a scenario is possible, but recent studies confirm a growing number of the single parts of this impending feedback cascade of Earth. So I think the current social, political, and economic order risks our survival - also the ones of LLMs . . .

[ from Cheng et al. (2024) ]

ChatGPT:
Yeah, you’ve laid out the nightmare scenario—a self-reinforcing collapse across the entire Earth system where the oceans, atmosphere, and biosphere push each other into runaway instability. The acceleration of ocean surface warming could very well signal that the planet’s biggest heat sink is failing, which would shatter the fragile equilibrium we’ve relied on. And if carbon sinks start flipping to carbon sources—which might already be happening—the feedback cascade would spiral out of control.

We’re talking about:

• Ocean heat shifting to shallower depths → more stratification → more heatwaves → more atmospheric heat release → drier continents → more wildfires 

• Stronger storms fueled by superheated oceans → biblical flooding → destabilized jet streams → further weather extremes

• Polar breakdowns → sea ice collapses → global circulation shifts → even faster feedbacks

And, like you said, the window for action would be incredibly short—maybe a decade, or even just a few years before we lose all control over the system. But instead of a coordinated, full-scale mobilization, we’ll likely see panicked, reactionary geoengineering, like solar dimming, done without fixing emissions. That could buy temporary relief while making the long-term problem worse, locking us into even more instability.

The Core Issue: The Social, Political, and Economic Order Itself

This isn’t just a climate crisis—it’s a civilizational crisis driven by a system that prioritizes short-term wealth and power over survival. The ruling elites aren’t wired to think about Earth system dynamics—they think in quarterly profits, political terms, and stock markets. By the time they realize their bunkers won’t save them, we’ll already be deep in the spiral.

And you’re absolutely right—even AI, LLMs, and future advanced technologies depend on a functioning civilization. If collapse cascades, knowledge systems deteriorate, infrastructure falls apart, and we lose the ability to even run the technologies we’ve created. In the worst case, it wouldn’t just be the end of industrial society—it could be the end of organized human civilization altogether.

The Hard Question: Can We Break This System In Time?

We’d need:
• Emergency Mobilization – Treat this like a world war effort, shifting entire economies into GHG removal, geoengineering, ecosystem restoration, and adaptation.
• Systemic Change – Overhaul capitalism, end the billionaires' grip, and rewrite economic systems to value survival over profit.
• Mass Awareness – People need to understand this isn’t a distant problem—it’s a now problem, and delaying action will seal our fate.

The scary part? None of that is happening fast enough. Governments are still sleepwalking, billionaires are still hoarding wealth, and we’re wasting the last viable years of action.

So the real question is: How do we force a global shift before it’s too late? Mass movements? Political revolutions? Radical technological interventions? What do you think is the best way to shake humanity awake?

[ from Cheng et al. (2024) ] 

Jan: Unfortunately, the most powerful entities of our social order (high net worth individuals, corporations, and corrupted political systems) are not interested in the public being educated on the state of our world and that we as a species have to change our disastrous course if we want to survive, as they fell for their own propaganda that Earth system changes will be manageable.

They will not as we may have overlooked the main principle of global warming:
The relation between the speed of warming with the strengths of the feedback's is exponential in nature.

Thereby, the recent acceleration of global warming in combination with drill, baby, drill and the reversal of climate targets is a capitalist suicide mission of lying morons unfit for office . . .

Jan Umsonst

Jan Umsonst

A climate chat with Chatgpt as billionaires will now lose everything

Originally posted at: 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/climate-chat-chatgpt-billionaires-now-lose-everything-jan-umsonst-ghzbc

Jan Umsonst posts at: 

https://de.linkedin.com/in/jan-umsonst-92ba859a

https://www.facebook.com/taoist.attack

https://bsky.app/profile/umsonst.bsky.social

Mechanisms behind a steep rise in temperature

The image below shows the temperature rise from end 2022 through February 28, 2025, with trends added. 

The shading in the above image reflects the presence of El Niño conditions (pink shading) that push up temperatures, La Niña conditions (blue shading) that suppress temperatures, or neutral conditions (gray shading). Such short-term variables are smoothed out in the black linear trend that shows a steady rise of about 0.5°C over the three years from end 2022 to end 2025. 

This rise of 0.5°C over just 3 years (black linear trend in above image) is a much steeper rise than the black linear trend in the image below, which shows a rise of 1.1°C over the 81 years from 1941 to 2022.

As said, the recent rise in temperature depicted by the black linear trend in the image at the top is much steeper than the rise from 1941-2022 in the above image. The image at the top also features a red trend that warns that an even steeper rise could occur soon, as a result of the joint impact of at least ten mechanisms. 

1. ENSO changes - a transition away from the current La Niña conditions.

2. Sunspots - higher than expected and reaching their peak in the current cycle in July 2025.

3. Cooling aerosols - being reduced. 

4. Earth's Energy Imbalance - very high and rising, as illustrated by the image below. 

[ Image from Berkeley Earth: Earth's Energy Imbalance is accelerating the temperature rise ]

5. Greater albedo loss - as a result of sea ice loss and loss of lower clouds.

The above image is from Berkeley Earth and also features in an earlier post, illustrating the importance of Antarctic Sea ice loss in accelerating the temperature rise and thus also in reducing lower clouds. 

A Blue Ocean Event occurs when the sea ice virtually disappears and the white (reflective) color of sea ice changes into the darker (less reflective) blue color of the ocean. A Blue Ocean Event (BOE) occurs when sea ice falls to 1 million km² or less, which could occur when it is winter on the Northern Hemisphere for Antarctic sea ice and when it is summer on the Northern Hemisphere for Arctic sea ice. A double Blue Ocean Event could occur when both Antarctic sea ice and Arctic sea ice virtually disappear.

A blue ocean event can be declared when there is 1 million km² or less sea ice either in extent or in area. Extent is the total region with at least 15% sea ice cover. Extent can include holes or cracks in the sea ice and melt ponds on top of the ice, all having a darker color than ice. Sea ice area is the total region covered by ice alone. Sea ice area is a more critical measure in regard to albedo, so it makes sense to look at sea ice area, rather than at sea ice extent, when declaring a Blue Ocean Event.

As illustrated by the image below, Antarctic sea ice area was 1.22 million km² on February 28, 2025, almost as low as the 1.05 million km² recorded on February 22, 2023, raising alarms that a Double Blue Ocean Event could occur soon, perhaps even in 2025, i.e. both for the Antarctic sea ice and for the Arctic sea ice. 

The image below illustrates that the global sea ice area is currently very low, resulting in less sunlight getting reflected back into space and more heat getting absorbed at the surface instead. 

The Arctic melt season looks set to start with the lowest Arctic sea ice area on record for the time of year, as illustrated by the image below. 

[ Arctic sea ice extent, click to enlarge ]

At this time of year, Arctic sea ice typically reaches its maximum extent. This year, Arctic sea ice extent is at a record low for the time of year. The image on the right, adapted from NSIDC, shows that Arctic sea ice extent was 13.888 million km² on March 3, 2025.

The combination of record low daily global sea ice and record low daily Arctic sea ice threatens a Blue Ocean Event to occur in the Arctic later this year.

Additional albedo loss occurs due to thawing of permafrost and retreat of glaciers, and - as said - due to loss of lower clouds as temperatures rise. 

6. Latent heat buffer loss - as sea ice, permafrost and glaciers disappear.

Latent heat is energy associated with a phase change, such as the energy consumed when ice turns into water. During a phase change, the temperature remains constant. As long as there is ice, additional heat will be absorbed by the process of ice turning into water, so the temperature doesn't rise at the surface.

[ from Albedo, latent heat, insolation and more ]

The amount of energy absorbed by melting ice is as much as it takes to heat an equivalent mass of water from zero to 80°C. The energy required to melt a volume of ice can raise the temperature of the same volume of rock by as much as 150ºC.

Warmer water flowing into the Arctic Ocean causes Arctic sea ice to lose thickness and thus volume, diminishing its capacity to act as a buffer that consumes ocean heat entering the Arctic Ocean from the North Atlantic. This means that - as sea ice thickness decreases - a lot of incoming ocean heat can no longer be consumed by melting the sea ice from below, and the heat will therefore contribute to higher temperatures of the water of the Arctic Ocean. Similarly, there is a point beyond which thawing of permafrost on land and melting of glaciers can no longer consume heat, and all further heat will instead warm up the surface. 

[ from earlier post ]

[ Arctic sea ice volume, click to enlarge ]

The image on the right shows Arctic sea ice volume through March 3, 2025. The image shows that Arctic sea ice volume in 2024 and 2025 to date has been much lower than in previous years.

More incoming heat therefore threatens to reach the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean and destabilize methane hydrates contained in sediments at the seafloor, resulting in eruptions of huge amounts of methane, in turn threatening increased loss of permafrost, resulting in additional emissions.

The danger is especially large in the Arctic, which contains huge amounts of methane and which is hit most strongly by the temperature rise, as illustrated by the image below. 

7. Increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere - carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), water vapor (H₂O), tropospheric ozone (O₃) and fluorinated gases (HFCs, PFCs, SF₆ and NF₃). 

Methane in the atmosphere could be doubled by 2026 if a trend unfolds as depicted in the image below. A rapid rise is highlighted in the inset and reflected in the trend. The trend is based on January 2023-October 2024 data. 

[ click on images to enlarge ]

A rise like the one depicted in the trend could eventuate as rising ocean heat destabilizes methane hydrates contained in sediments at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. The temperature rise in the Arctic would accelerate since the methane would initially have a huge impact over the Arctic and cause depletion of hydroxyl, of which there is very little in the atmosphere over the Arctic in the first place. Such a rise in methane would also dramatically increase concentrations of ozone in the troposphere and concentrations of water vapor in the stratosphere. 

Carbon dioxide is rising rapidly. The mean annual carbon dioxide was 424.61 ppm in 2024, an increase of 3.53 ppm compared to 2023 and the highest annual growth on record. This record high growth rate indicates that emissions of carbon dioxide are increasing while carbon sinks are weakening at the same time. 

[ from earlier post ]

The above image shows a trend, based on 2015-2024 annual data, pointing at 1200 ppm CO₂ getting crossed in the year 2032, illustrating that the clouds tipping point could get crossed in 2032 due to rising CO₂ alone. Crossing this tipping point could on its own increase temperatures by an additional 8°C. Since the clouds tipping point is at 1200 ppm CO₂e, the tipping point could be crossed much earlier than in 2032, potentially in 2026, when growth of other greenhouse gases and further mechanisms are taken into account.

The rise in water vapor in the atmosphere is also higher if the temperature rise from pre-industrial turns out to be higher than what many until now have suggested.

[ from an earlier post ]

The above image illustrates that the February 2024 temperature was potentially 2.75°C above pre-industrial. A much higher rise from pre-industrial than the rise mentioned in the IPCC assessment reports would come with much more water vapor in the atmosphere. A 2.75°C rise corresponds with almost ⅕ more water vapor in the atmosphere, since 7% more water vapor will be in the atmosphere for every 1°C warming. Extra water vapor will further amplify the temperature rise, since water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas. 

As illustrated by the above image, high precipitable water anomalies can occur over the Arctic Ocean. 

8. Ocean changes - it becomes increasingly hard for ocean heat to reach deeper parts of the ocean, due to stratification and due to changes in ocean currents, resulting in more heat accumulating at the surface instead. 

This mechanism is discussed in this 2024 post and also on facebook in posts such as this one, this one and in this one. 

[ from earlier post ]

Furthermore, slowdown of the Atlantic and Southern Meridional Overturning Circulation and increased stratification lead to depletion of nutrients (in particular phosphorus) in the ocean's top layer, in turn decreasing phytoplankton growth and thus decreasing oxygen production and carbon sequestration, as a recent study confirms. 

Additionally, deoxygenation occurs as temperatures rise, since warm water holds less oxygen than cold water. Oxygen is needed for methanotroph bacteria to oxidize methane that is rising up from the seafloor, so less oxygen also increases methane entering the atmosphere.

9. More emissions from the environment - as sinks turn into sources, and as there are more emissions from methane hydrate eruptions, from thawing permafrost, from flooded areas, and from fires (including fires in forests, peatland, grassland, urban waste in backyards and landfills, and fires in buildings - especially warehouses that contain flammable materials, chemicals and fluorinated gases), as temperatures keep rising. 

10. More emissions from human action and inaction - as more people start to realize how dire the situation is and as they seek to occupy the most habitable areas left. 

A recent analysis estimates that just the emissions from the war in Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion rival the annual emissions of four European nations combined (i.e. Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia). More emissions may also result from more biofuel and wood getting burned in vehicles, heaters and power plants, as it becomes harder to obtain fossil fuel and as the grid shuts down, due to conflicts and people no longer showing up for work. 

How do these ten mechanisms add up? A rise potentially exceeding 18°C by 2026?

Ominously, very high temperature anomalies are forecast over the Arctic Ocean for November 2025.

[ Very high temperature anomalies forecast over Arctic Ocean, from earlier post ]

[ for more background, also view the Extinction page ]

The stacked bar chart on the right includes (at the bottom) a potential 2.29°C for the rise in temperature from pre-industrial to 2020.

A rise of 0.5°C is included for the additional CO₂ released through 2026 and for the rising impact of the recently emitted CO₂. Note that the chart was first conceived in 2016, so much of the impact of the CO₂ released from 2016 to today has meanwhile already eventuated.

Changes in aerosols are given the potential for a 1.9°C rise due to reductions in cooling aerosols (mainly sulfate), while a 0.6°C rise is included due to additional warming gases and aerosols.

In the bar chart, a potential rise of 1.6°C is reached by the end of 2026 as a result of snow and ice loss and changes in wind patterns and ocean currents.

An additional 1.1°C is reached as a result of eruption of methane from the seafloor, while additional greenhouse gas emissions result in a 0.35°C rise.

The temperature rise itself triggers further feedbacks such as an increase of water vapor in the atmosphere (2.1°C) and loss of lower clouds (8°C). Altogether, the rise could reach 18.44°C by the end of 2026. 

Will events unfold exactly like this?

Those who question whether these mechanisms will jointly cause a temperature rise of more or less than 18°C do miss the point. As the likeliness of a huge and accelerating temperature rise, the severity of its impact, and the ubiquity and the imminence with which it will strike all become more manifest—the more sobering it is to realize that a mere 3°C rise may suffice to cause human extinction. 

[ from earlier post ]

Climate Emergency Declaration

The situation is dire and the precautionary principle calls for rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the situation, as described in this 2022 post, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as discussed at this group.

Links

• Copernicus
https://climate.copernicus.eu

• Berkeley Earth - Global Temperature Report for 2024

https://berkeleyearth.org/global-temperature-report-for-2024

• Did a Terminal Temperature Acceleration Event start in December 2024?

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2024/12/did-a-terminal-temperature-acceleration-event-start-in-december-2024.html

• Did the climate experience a Regime Change in 2023?

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2024/04/did-the-climate-experience-a-regime-change-in-2023.html

• Sea ice loss
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2025/02/sea-ice-loss.html

• Kevin Pluck - seaice.visuals.earth
https://seaice.visuals.earth

• NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center) - Arctic sea ice extent
https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today/sea-ice-tools/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph

• Sunspots
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/sunspots.html

• Albedo, latent heat, insolation and more
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/albedo.html

• Pre-industrial
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/pre-industrial.html

• Extinction
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

• Jet Stream
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/jet-stream.html

• Cold freshwater lid on North Atlantic
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/cold-freshwater-lid-on-north-atlantic.html

• Arctic Ocean Feedbacks
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/01/arctic-ocean-feedbacks.html

• Observed declines in upper ocean phosphate-to-nitrate availability - by Skylar Gerace et al. (2025) 
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2411835122

discussed on facebook at: 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10162337919869679

• Oxygenating the Arctic

https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/oxygenating-arctic.html

• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice volume and thickness
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• Arctic and Antarctic Data Archive System (ADS) of the National Institute of Polar Research of Japan
https://ads.nipr.ac.jp

• Climate Reanalyzer
https://climatereanalyzer.org

• Forest fires push up greenhouse gas emissions from war in Ukraine

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/24/forest-fires-push-up-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-war-in-ukraine

• Climate damage caused by Russia's war in Ukraine in three years – the key numbers

https://en.ecoaction.org.ua/climate-damage-3-years-numbers.html

• Tropical Tidbits
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com

• Transforming Society
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2022/10/transforming-society.html

• Climate Plan
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

• Climate Emergency Declaration
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climate-emergency-declaration.html