Showing posts with label El Nino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label El Nino. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2026

A huge rise in temperature in 2026?

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) recorded by NOAA was at a record high of 433.24 parts per million (ppm) on April 5, 2026, at Mauna Loa, Hawaii.

The image below illustrates that the daily average for the de-seasonalized global average CO₂ trend was at a record high of 427.5 ppm on April 13, 2026.


The above image shows daily averaged CO₂ through April 13, 2026, from four observatories: Utqiaġvik, formerly known as Barrow, Alaska (in blue), Mauna Loa, Hawaii (in red), American Samoa (in green), and South Pole, Antarctica (in yellow). The thick black lines represent the average of the smoothed seasonal curves and the smoothed, de-seasonalized curves for each of the records. These lines are a very good estimate of the global average levels of CO₂. 

The annual maximum for CO₂ is typically reached in May, so the daily average CO₂ looks set to reach even higher levels in May 2026. The image below, from an earlier post, shows that the 2024 global CO₂ concentration increased by 3.77 ppm, the highest annual growth on record. 


CO₂ is now higher than it has been for millions of years

The image below, from an earlier post, shows CO₂ over thousands of years through April 1, 2026, when the daily average CO₂ concentration recorded by the Keeling Curve, maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at Mauna Loa Observatory, was 432.81 ppm.


Concentrations of CO₂ haven't been this high for millions of years and they are still increasing rapidly. A recent analysis led by Sarah Shackleton and Julia Marks-Peterson finds that, while the average temperature of the ocean has decreased by 2 to 2.5°C over the past 3 million years, average atmospheric CO₂ levels have likely remained below 300 ppm over this time, as discussed in an earlier post.

This makes the recent daily concentration of 433.24 ppm at Mauna Loa even more threatening. It means that, in addition to the key role of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, there were also important contributions from other components of the climate system such as Earth’s reflectivity, variations in vegetation and/or ice cover and ocean circulation.

According to the IPCC, limiting warming to 2°C would have required global greenhouse gas emissions to have peaked before 2025 at the latest, which hasn't happened. In other words, we're headed for a rise that may exceed 3°C above pre-industrial soon. How fast could such a rise eventuate? The two images and text below are from the earlier post What Does Runaway Warming Look Like?

Forcing caused by the rapid rise in the levels of greenhouse gases is far out of line with current temperatures. A 10°C higher temperature is more in line with these levels, as illustrated by the image below, based on 420,000 years of ice core data from Vostok, Antarctica.


How fast could such a 10°C temperature rise eventuate? The image below gives an idea.


A study led by James Hansen concludes that equilibrium global warming for today’s amount of greenhouse gases is 10°C, which is reduced to 8°C by today’s human-made aerosols, and while James Hansen doesn't expect a 10°C rise soon, he warns that decline of aerosol emissions could increase global warming rapidly, in addition to the acceleration already occurring now.

James Hansen doesn't expect a huge rise to occur soon, as the temperature rise of the atmosphere is slowed by take up of extra energy by oceans, land and ice. According to the IPCC AR6 WG1, 91% of the extra energy is taken up by oceans, 5% by land, 3% by ice melting and 1% remains in the atmosphere.

However, extra energy is increasing as greenhouse gas concentrations keep rising, while additionally the capacity of oceans, land and ice to take up extra energy is increasingly compromised. This could cause a huge rise in temperature soon, especially on land in the Northern Hemisphere where there is proportionally more land. The temperature can be expected to rise even faster during heatwaves and especially in large cities that are additionally affected by the Urban Heat Island effect. 

How fast could the temperature rise on land in the Northern Hemisphere exceed 3°C?

The image below shows NASA March 2026 Land+Ocean temperature anomalies vs 1951-1980 in °C.
The above image illustrates that the temperature rise comes with polar amplification, as well as distortion of the Jet Stream enabling cold air to move from high latitudes to lower latitudes and resulting in high temperature anomalies in some areas, with anomalies as high as 10.4°C showing up on the map. 

Feedbacks in the Arctic and the accelerating rise of Arctic temperatures can be hidden from public discussion by a focus on long-term global or hemispheric averages, as also discussed in earlier posts such as this one. Over the years, temperature anomalies have been highest in the Arctic, as illustrated by the image below.


The image below is adapted from a NASA image with a trend showing change from 1954 to 2025. 


The danger is particularly high in the Arctic, where huge amounts of methane are stored in the form of hydrates at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean and in the form of free gas underneath the hydrates. 

The IPCC seeks to downplay the danger of methane eruptions from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean in many ways, e.g. by a focus on global average temperatures, by using anomalies calculated from a base that isn't pre-industrial and by minimizing the rise to come with projections for future temperatures based on long periods of historical data that are further manipulated by using linear trends to hide recent acceleration and the potential for further acceleration.

The image below, from an earlier post, shows a temperature anomaly forecast for December 2026, with very high anomalies again showing up over most of the Arctic Ocean.


Meanwhile, the surface air temperature in the Southern Hemisphere remains at a record high for the time of year, as illustrated by the image below that shows SH temperatures through April 11, 2026.


The danger looms large that a Double Blue Ocean Event will occur, i.e. not only for Arctic sea ice later this year, but also for Antarctic sea ice early next year, as warned about in posts such as this one and this one that also points out that the IPCC has failed to warn about Antarctic sea ice decline.

Acceleration of the temperature rise is illustrated by the image below, made with NASA Land-Only anomalies vs. 1880-1890 (not pre-industrial) through March 2026.

The above image indicates that anomalies (versus 1880-1890) have been high since 2021, i.e. the rise in temperature has been at or above 1.5°C for each month since 2021 (black squares connected by the black lines). The Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that the temperature rise accelerated in 2022 and crossed 2°C in 2022, while the trend further indicates that 3°C may get crossed soon on land (where most people live), in 2029 if this trend continues (linear dashed red extension) or even earlier if the trend's rise accelerates further (as illustrated by the image below with a polynomial trend). 

The image below illustrates that the upcoming El Niño could trigger a rapid and steep rise in temperature on land in the Northern Hemisphere in the course of 2026. 


The image shows land-only data in the Northern Hemisphere through March 2026, with a polynomial trend added that points at 3°C crossed later in 2026. About 0.5°C of the rise can be attributed to El Niño, with further contributions from feedbacks and further forcers. Note that the 1901-2000 base is not pre-industrial, the outlook may be even more dire when using a genuinely pre-industrial base. 

At times, areas can be hit by anomalies that strongly exceed 3°C, as illustrated by the image below that shows that the temperature anomaly versus 1951-19880 for the United States in March 2026 was 4.1°C. 


Strong El Niño on the way

The image below, adapted from NOAA, shows ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) probabilities for the Niño3.4 region (5°N-5°S,120°W-170°W) relative sea surface temperature index, indicating El Niño (red bar) will emerge in the course of 2026.


The bars on the image below, adapted from NOAA, indicate the likely strength of the upcoming El Niño. 


The ECMWF April 2026 forecasts indicate that a very strong El Niño could emerge in the course of 2026, as illustrated by the combination image below.

[ click on images to enlarge ]

According to a NOAA outlook issued April 6, 2026, La Niña is still present and a transition from La Niña to ENSO-neutral is expected in the next month, so a steep increase in temperature can be expected to occur over the next few months. 

The combination image below illustrates the rise of sea surface temperature anomalies in the Niño 1+2 region of more than 3°C (from less than -1.5°C to more than 1.5°C) over the past four months.  


Ocean temperature

A huge amount of heat has accumulated in oceans, as illustrated by the above image, adapted from Rosenstiel School. Much of this ocean heat is on track to move from the ocean to the atmosphere over the next few months, and much ocean heat will also move along the path of ocean currents to the Arctic Ocean, resulting in sea ice decline.

The world (60°S–60°N, 0–360°E) sea surface temperature (SST) was 21.16°C on April 16, 2026, a record high for the time of year and 0.81°C higher than 1982-2010, as illustrated by the image below.


The SST on April 16, 2026, was just short of the record high SST of 21.17°C reached in 2024. On April 16, 2026, the SST was 0.47°C higher than it was on January 1, 2026.

Arctic sea ice decline

A Blue Ocean Event could be declared when Arctic sea ice reaches or crosses a threshold of 1 million km² in extent. However, extent can include holes, gaps or cracks in the sea ice and melt ponds on top of the ice, all having a darker color than ice. By contrast, sea ice area is the total region covered by ice alone, making it a more critical measurement in regard to albedo and the capacity of sea ice to act as a buffer that consumes incoming ocean heat. Accordingly, the critical threshold for a Blue Ocean Event to occur can be said to be 1 million km² in area.

The image below shows Arctic sea ice area over the years, with 2012 highlighted in blue and 2026 highlighted in black. On September 12, 2012, Arctic sea ice area was 2.24 million km². On April 16, 2012, Arctic sea ice area was 13.03 million km². On April 16, 2026, Arctic sea ice area was 11.87 million km², a record low for the time of year and 1.16 million km² lower than it was on April 16, 2012. A Blue Ocean Event could occur in September 2026 if Arctic sea ice area by then would be at least 1.24 million km² lower than it was in 2012.

Following the 2023/2024 El Niño, Arctic sea ice area on March 19, 2025, was 1.34 million km² lower than on March 19, 2012. In March 2025, La Niña conditions were present that continued until recently and in the course of year, the 2025 area grew compared to the 2012 area.

This year, the situation is different. While a NOAA outlook issued April 6, 2026, finds La Niña still to be present, a transition to ENSO-neutral is expected in May 2026, and El Niño is likely to emerge in June-August 2026, with chances of a very strong El Niño increasing over the course of 2026. In other words, a steep increase in temperature can be expected over the next few months. 

Latent heat is energy associated with a phase change, such as the energy consumed when ice turns into water. During a phase change, the temperature remains constant. As long as there is ice, additional heat will be absorbed by the process of ice turning into water, so the temperature doesn't rise at the surface.
The amount of energy absorbed by melting ice is as much as it takes to heat an equivalent mass of water from zero to 80°C. The energy required to melt a volume of ice can raise the temperature of the same volume of rock by as much as 150ºC.

The danger that a Blue Ocean Event will occur in September 2026 is further illustrated by the image below, from an earlier post, showing Arctic sea ice volume in the past 25 years. Markers show April (blue) and September (red) volume, corresponding with the year's maximum and minimum. In 2025, Arctic sea ice reached a record low maximum volume, as well as a record low minimum volume.


As illustrated by the above image, adapted from dmi.dk, Arctic sea ice volume was very low in April 2025, so while relatively little melting took place from April 2025 to September 2025, a record low Arctic sea ice volume was still reached in September 2025. The above image shows Arctic sea ice volume through mid February 2026, with an analysis of the strength of the melting between April (annual maximum) and September (annual minimum) by means of the bars colored magenta (strong melting) and green (little melting).

If the downward trend in annual maxima (blue circles) continues, Arctic sea ice looks set to reach an even lower maximum volume in April 2026. The difference between strong melting (magenta) and little melting (green) is 3000 km³, so if strong melting will take place from April 2026, this may well cause a Blue Ocean Event to occur later in 2026. A Blue Ocean Event could also be said to occur when only 1000 km³ or less Arctic sea ice volume remains. The image below, adapted from dmi.dk, shows that Arctic sea ice volume was at a record low for the time of year on April 17, 2026. 


The image below, from an earlier post, illustrates the threat of thinning of Arctic sea ice resulting in increased ocean heat and methane eruptions. Arctic sea ice decline could strongly contribute to the temperature rise, as illustrated by the image below and also discussed in this earlier post
[ The Buffer is gone ]
Human extinction

In 2022, the IPCC said that limiting warming to 2°C would require global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest. As discussed in an earlier post, it looks like we have missed the target of limiting the temperature rise to 2°C, while humans are likely to go extinct with a 3°C rise in temperature, yet the IPCC refuses to warn people about the dire situation. 

The screenshot below describes the existential danger for humans.  
The screenshot below adds: 

Climate Emergency Declaration

The situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as in this 2022 post and this 2025 post, and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.



Links

• NOAA - Recent Daily Average CO2 at Mauna Loa, Hawaii

• NOAA - Daily global CO2

• NOAA - Climate at a Glance Global Time Series

• NOAA - El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) diagnostic discussion
discussed on facebook at: 

• ECMWF - European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts - El Niño charts

• NASA - Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) Surface Temperature Analysis
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp

• Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Horrific temperature anomalies forecast over Arctic Ocean

Antarctic sea ice

The combination image below shows Antarctic sea ice thickness and concentration by the University of Bremen (left and center) and concentration by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (right) on February 17, 2026. The NSIDC image also shows the median Antarctic sea ice edge 1981-2010 highlighted in orange. 


Loss of Antarctic sea ice can result in strong loss of global albedo, due to the size of Antarctic sea ice and its proximity to the Equator.

Arctic sea ice


Arctic sea ice volume is at a record low for the time of year, as it has been for well over a year. The above image shows Arctic sea ice volume through February 18, 2026. 

Until now, Arctic sea ice volume for each day in 2026 has been lower than on comparable days for any previous year on record. The 2026 curve (black) is moving down, steeper than it did in 2024 (dark blue), even though an El Niño started early 2024 and continued until early 2025 (light blue). Arctic temperatures are terrifying and some temperature forecasts are horrendous (images below). Arctic temperatures have been rising, despite the move from an El Niño into the current La Niña over the past few years. Making the outlook even more dire, an El Niño is on the way.

The next El Niño

[ click on images to enlarge ]
Moving from the bottom of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño alone can make a difference of more than 0.5°C, as discussed in an earlier post.

The images on the right and below are adapted from NOAA. The image on the right shows Niño-3.4 region temperature anomalies and forecasts. The image below shows that La Niña conditions have been present for most periods (18 out of 19) dating back to the May-June-July 2024 period. 


[ click on images to enlarge ]
The image on the right, adapted from NOAA, shows ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) probabilities for the Niño3.4 region (5°N-5°S,120°W-170°W) relative sea surface temperature index, with El Niño (red bar) emerging in the course of 2026. 

The combination image below, adapted from ECMWF, shows ENSO anomalies and forecasts for developments through February 2027 in Niño3.4 (left panel) and in Niño1+2 (right panel), indicating that the next El Niño will emerge and strengthen in the course of 2026. 


The combination image below, adapted from ECMWF, shows anomalies and forecasts through August 2026 in the Niño3 region (left panel) and the Niño1+2 region (right panel).


IPCC keeps downplaying Arctic temperature anomaly

The image below shows a horrendous temperature anomaly forecast, adapted from tropicaltidbits.com, valid for November 2026, with anomalies at the top end of the scale (13°C) showing up over most of the Arctic Ocean.


Sadly, the IPCC keeps downplaying the dangers and it does so in many ways. One way the full wrath of temperature rise is all too often masked is by using a too recent base from which the temperature rise is calculated, and then pretending that it was pre-industrial. Pre-historic obviously and by definition refers to times before the Industrial Revolution started, yet the IPCC seeks to downplay the dangers of crossing the Paris Agreement thresholds by using a more recent base, adding that it "approximates" pre-industrial, as if that would excuse the downplaying. Obviously, a higher historic rise comes with stronger feedbacks, e.g. more water vapor in the atmosphere. 

Then, there's the masking of the acceleration in the temperature rise. As illustrated by the Eliot Jacobson image below, which uses a 3-year running mean, the temperature has meanwhile crossed the 1.5°C threshold and reached 1.53°C even when using an 1850-1900 base, while there clearly is acceleration in the temperature rise.


Temperature anomalies have long been high in the Arctic. The image below shows rising annual Arctic temperature anomalies versus 1951-1980, with a peak occurring in 2016, which was a strong El Niño year, while temperatures have been rising over the past few years despite the move from an El Niño into the current La Niña. 


The image below shows the ERA5 January 2026 temperature anomaly versus 1951-1980, hitting the Arctic particularly hard. 


The image below shows the NASA January 2026 temperature anomaly versus 1951-1980, with the highest anomalies showing up over the Arctic, due to sea ice loss and increasingly extreme weather events resulting from distortion of the Jet Stream, which also contributed to low temperatures in parts of the U.S. and Russia. Feedbacks in the Arctic and the horrendous rise of Arctic temperatures is all too often masked by a focus on long-term global averages. 


The IPCC also seeks to downplay the dangers by manipulating the rise to come, e.g. by using linear trends. The image below shows NASA Land-Only temperature anomalies with respect to 1880-1890 (not pre-industrial) from 2022 through January 2026. The 1.5°C threshold has been crossed for all months since 2022 (black squares connected by black lines). The Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that the 2°C threshold was crossed since 2022 and that 3°C may get crossed soon on land (where most people live), i.e. in 2029 if this trend continues (dashed extension).


The extension in the above image is a linear extension, but acceleration implies that alternative trends are more appropriate, such as polynomial trends. The image below shows 15 years of NASA temperature anomalies (land-only) compared to 1880-1920 with a quartic trend added that points at the 3°C threshold getting crossed in 2027.

The trend in the above image points at 3°C getting crossed and this 3°C is an important threshold. Humans are likely to go extinct with a 3°C rise, so the canvas in the above image is limited to  3°C. For a rise beyond 3°C, see the image below and the Extinction page and the image below. 

The inset with the pink/white canvas on the image below shows ERA5 global surface air temperature daily anomalies in °C versus 1991-2020 through February 11, 2026, with a polynomial trend added highlighting temperature variations in line with seasons, El Niño/La Niña, feedbacks, etc. The background image with the yellow canvas shows the same data and added trend on a larger canvas, with the trend pointing at a rise of 10°C in January 2027. 

[ click on images to enlarge, this image is also discussed on facebook ]


The Methane Menace

Paul Beckwith, in the video below, discusses 'Methane: The Emergency Brake for Global Heating'. 


There have long been calls for action on methane, which can strongly reduce the temperatures rise, due to its high Global Warming Potential (GWP). 

[ from earlier post ]
Conversely, methane can also strongly contribute to a huge rise in temperature. Both the SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6 scenarios required methane emissions to have fallen since 2015. Even for SSP2-4.5, in which 2°C does get crossed, methane emissions would need to fall. After record growth in methane concentration in 2021, there was a bit of a slowdown in growth in the following years. However, growth in methane concentration has picked up pace again recently, as illustrated by the image below. 


The magenta-colored trend in the image below points at methane more than doubling by 2043. 

The above text and images describe and depict horrendous dangers, and the IPCC has yet to respond. Methane is only one of the contributors to what could be a horrific rise in temperature in the Arctic. 


Averaging the problems away

As the EPA animation on the right illustrates, a relatively small rise in average temperature can result in a lot more hot and extremely hot weather.

The three images underneath, from the IPCC, show the effect on extreme temperatures when (a) the mean temperature increases, (b) the variance increases, and (c) when both the mean and variance increase for a normal distribution of temperature.

Another way used to downplay the dangers is by averaging out peak impact, i.e. the most destructive impact. Averaging out peaks can be done by looking at large areas with a low resolution. As an example, land-only temperatures are rising faster than ocean temperatures. Since most people live on land, it's crucial to report the full temperature peaks on land, rather than the global average.

Yet another way used to downplay the dangers is by averaging the temperature rise out over long periods of time. How can the thresholds set at the Paris Agreement best be measured? Is a threshold deemed to be crossed when the anomaly from pre-industrial crosses the threshold for a month, or for a year, or for a decade?

Averaging out over a long period can be used to downplay the dangers in efforts to effectively grant polluters a long grace period during which they can continue to pollute. 

Uncertainty is often pointed at as an excuse to downplay the dangers, but even in case there is uncertainty, downplaying the dangers constitutes a violation of the crucial precautionary principle, as illustrated by the cartoon below.

An engineer building a bridge will calculate the load it must handle by looking at how many heavy trucks could be on the bridge simultaneously (PEAK traffic), rather than by averaging the weight of all vehicles crossing the bridge over 30 years.
Caption and image by Sam Carana, image is from earlier post.
Will life soon disappear?

[ from earlier post ]
The image on the right uses content from a study by Christina Schädel et al, which concludes that permafrost fires and thaw will release 63 Gt C for each degree Celsius rise in temperature from a 389-691 Gt pool of permafrost carbon.

That 63 Gt C would translate into 231 Gt CO₂ if only CO₂ gets released. By comparison, the total annual human emissions are now about 55 Gt CO₂e and NOAA calculates that the atmosphere has changed from 1750 to 2024 by 539 ppm CO₂e due to people's greenhouse gas emissions.

Importantly, some of the carbon will be released in the form of methane and CO₂e is much higher for releases in the form of methane than for carbon dioxide, especially when a high multiplier is used to calculate methane's CO₂e. Even worse, releases from submarine permafrost would come mostly in the form of methane.

The danger is even more menacing when looking at how fast temperatures are rising in the Arctic and when including more feedbacks, i.e. not only the impact of permafrost fires and permafrost thaw, but also the impact of destabilizing sediments at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean resulting in eruptions of huge amounts of methane, on top of the impact of albedo loss and loss of the latent heat buffer of declining sea ice and permafrost. 

The image below, by Eliot Jacobson, shows a 36-running average for Earth's albedo through December 2025.


As discussed above, the next El Niño may take off from a temperature 0.5°C higher than where El Niño developed in 2023. The image below, by Leon Simons, shows Earth's Energy Imbalance through December 2025 when it reached +1.4 W/m², as discussed on facebook.


As discussed, drawing linear trends can be used to downplay the danger and to mask recent or near-future acceleration that may also strengthen over the years. Moreover, crossing tripping points can result in huge abrupt changes. A recent study warns about States and financial bodies using modelling that ignores shocks from extreme weather and climate tipping points.

Warnings are further illustrated by the image below that features a gradually accelerating decline in biodiversity (red line) and infrastructure growth over time followed by imminent and abrupt infrastructure decline (grey line). The image warns that a false focus can cause imminent or ongoing collapse to be ignored.

[ click on images to enlarge, image is discussed on facebook ]
Ultimately, economic projections fail because they focus on money, global GDP, and similar constructs, ignoring the damage occurring to the soil, water, atmosphere and the very conditions that sustain life. Increasingly unlivable conditions result from a failure to correct this false focus, or rather from a refusal to accept that what's really important is disappearing—indeed life itself is disappearing before our own eyes.

In the video below, Guy McPherson discusses problems forests have in adapting to rising temperatures, illustrating the dangers.


Indeed, temperatures are rising too fast for forests to adapt by moving to higher latitudes. It takes centuries for tree populations to adapt—far too slow to keep pace with today’s rapid warming. Merely planting trees may not help much if the soil lacks ectomycorrhizal fungi, a recent study points out. Also, adding biochar to the soil may help, but there currently isn't much government support, support that should preferably come in the form of local feebates.


Climate Emergency Declaration

The situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as in this 2022 post and this 2025 post, and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.



Links

• NSIDC - Sea Ice Today
https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today

• University of Bremen - sea ice concentration and thickness
https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/start
• Danish Meteorological Institute - Arctic sea ice volume and thickness
https://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

• Tropicaltidbits.com
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com
image discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163809174829679


• NOAA - ENSO Alert System Status (pdf)

• NOAA - ENSO Alert System Status

• NOAA - Relative Oceanic Niño Index (RONI): Historical El Niño / La Niña episodes
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso/roni
discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163817526189679

• ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) - Niño Plumes
https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_nino_annual_plumes
discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/permalink/10163819996829679
set 2:
https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_nino_plumes
discussed on Facebook at: 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/?multi_permalinks=10163853533389679

• NASA - Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) Surface Temperature Analysis

• When Will We Die?

• Extinction
https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

• Copernicus ERA5 data
https://pulse.climate.copernicus.eu

• Coupled, decoupled, and abrupt responses of vegetation to climate across timescales - by David Fastovich et al.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adr6700
discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163832954534679

• Climate mismatches with ectomycorrhizal fungi contribute to migration lag in North American tree range shifts - by Michael Van Nuland et al.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2308811121
discussed on facebook at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/arcticnews/posts/10163832955574679

• Science Snippets: Linking Plants with Soil - video by Guy McPherson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TNxF9o2aTk

• Biochar - group on facebook