Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska
Greenhouse gas concentrations recorded at Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, are very high and rising. Below is a compilation of four images adapted from images issued by NOAA on January 19, 2026. The images show carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) concentrations recorded at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North latitude.
Mauna Loa, Hawaii
Below is a compilation of four images adapted from images issued by NOAA on January 19, 2026. The images show carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) concentrations recorded at the Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO), a NOAA station at Hawaii, at 19.54° N latitude.
Earth Energy Imbalance
Rising greenhouse gas concentrations alone do not sufficiently convey how dangerous the situation is. As illustrated by the image below, the Earth Energy Imbalance has risen strongly over the years. The image, by Eliot Jacobson, shows the net difference between incoming solar energy and heat radiated out by the planet through October 2025.
The rise in the Earth Energy Imbalance is caused by - among other things - a rise in the heat trapped by high (and rising) greenhouse gas concentrations and a decline in the Earth albedo (reflectivity).
Earth Albedo
The image below, by Eliot Jacobson, shows the 36-month running average for the Earth's albedo through November 2025, when albedo was 28.682%, a fall of 0.65% from 2003. According to a 2005 NASA article, a 1% fall in Earth’s albedo would have a climate effect of 1.7 W m⁻², roughly equal to the climate effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at the time (1.66 W m⁻²).
Decline in the Earth albedo is caused by - among other things - decline of sea ice.
Sea ice decline
The combination image below shows Antarctic sea ice thickness and concentration by the University of Bremen (left and center) and concentration by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (right) on January 19, 2026. The NSIDC image also shows the median Antarctic sea ice edge 1981-2010 highlighted in orange.
Decline of Antarctic sea ice and of the snow and ice cover over Antarctica contributes to elevation of the global temperature that can be expected to persist at least through September 2026, when Arctic sea ice typically reaches its minimum extent and area.
Arctic sea ice decline is illustrated by the image below. Arctic sea ice extent was 1.45 million km² lower than 1981-2010 on January 19, 2026, the lowest extent on record for the time of year and a deviation from 1981-2010 of -3.22σ.
The above image highlights Arctic sea ice extent anomalies through January 19, 2026. The year 2026 is highlighted in black. Furthermore, the year 2025 is highlighted by a darker color and the year 2012 is highlighted in blue; Arctic sea ice area reached a record low in 2012.
Arctic sea ice has also become very thin. Arctic sea ice volume is at a record low for the time of year, it has been at a record daily low for well over a year. The image below shows Arctic sea ice volume through January 20, 2026.
This means that less of the heat entering the Arctic Ocean from the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean can get consumed in the process of melting the sea ice and more of the heat will instead elevate the temperature of the water of the Arctic ocean, threatening to destabilize sediments that contain methane and to cause eruption of huge amounts of methane from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean.
Snow and ice cover decline is one of many feedbacks of the temperature rise. Further feedbacks include a rise in water vapor in the atmosphere, a decline in the reflectivity of lower clouds and a decline of the capacity of oceans and land to take up carbon dioxide and heat.
The image on the right illustrates how the temperature rise can cause oceans to take up less heat, resulting in more heat remaining in the atmosphere. In addition to these feedbacks, more fuel getting burned, reductions in the aerosol masking effect and an emerging El Niño can further elevate temperatures dramatically in 2026.
Temperature rise
The image below with NASA Land-Only annual anomalies with respect to 1880-1912 shows that 1.5°C was crossed for all years from 2015 through 2025 (black squares). Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that 2°C was crossed after 2022 (in 2023, 2024 and 2025) and that 3°C may get crossed soon, as early as in 2031 if this trend continues (dashed extension).
Note that the 1880-1912 base is not pre-industrial. Temperature anomalies can be even higher when a genuinely pre-industrial base is used.
The above image is similar, it uses an 1880-1920 base and shows that the 1.5°C threshold was crossed for temperatures on land since 2015, when politicians pledged at the Paris Agreement to take efforts to prevent this from occurring. The image has a polynomial trend added that points at 3°C getting crossed in early 2027. Crossing 3°C on land is important, since most people live on land and there are indications that such a rise will cause many species (including humans) to go extinct.
Failure to warn, failure to act
The science community, the IPCC, the UN, politicians and national governments have all failed to convey the seriousness of the threat of rising temperatures. That conclusion seems obvious, yet they keep refusing to call for, let alone to take appropriate action. There are some notable exceptions, but the sad conclusion is that in general they have failed and - even worse - they refuse to admit their failure.
UN secretary-general António Guterres has pointed at the need for “a credible global response plan to get us on track” regarding the international goal of limiting the global temperature rise. “The science demands action, the law commands it,” Guterres said, referring to an international court of justice ruling. “The economics compel it and people are calling for it.”
Yet, the very approach of leaving it up to the UN to "identify and resolve" problems by negotiating international consensus on carbon budgets, net-zero targets and offsets is a delusion. It's a diversion fabricated and advocated by polluters to delay climate action and to enable those very polluters to keep polluting for decades to come. Instead, Arctic-news has for many years identified the problems and has pointed out how to improve the situation.
Climate Emergency Declaration
The situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as in this 2022 post and this 2025 post, and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.
The combination image below shows Antarctic sea ice thickness and concentration by the University of Bremen (left and center) and concentration by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (right) on January 16, 2026. The NSIDC image also shows the median Antarctic sea ice edge 1981-2010 highlighted in orange.
Massive loss of albedo (reflectivity) amplifies the decline of Antarctic sea ice and the decline of the snow and ice cover over Antarctica, resulting in elevation of the global temperature that can be expected to persist at least through September 2026, when Arctic sea ice typically reaches its minimum extent.
Less Antarctic sea ice contributes strongly to lower albedo, due to the size of Antarctic sea ice and its proximity to the Equator.
The image below, by Eliot Jacobson, shows that the 36-month running average for the Earth's albedo has meanwhile hit yet another new record low, at 28.689%.
Additional elevation of the global temperature can be expected due to an emerging El Niño.
The next El Niño
[ click on images to enlarge ]
The above image shows very high temperature anomalies forecast around Antarctica and over the Arctic Ocean for September 2026, at a time when Arctic sea ice volume is expected to be very low. Moving from the bottom of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño can in itself make a difference of more than 0.5°C, as discussed in an earlier post.
The image on the right, adapted from NOAA, shows Niño-3.4 region temperature anomalies and forecasts.
The image on the right, adapted from NOAA, shows ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) probabilities, with El Niño (red bar) emerging in the course of 2026.
The image below, adapted from ECMWF, shows the ENSO anomalies and forecasts for developments through November 2026 in Niño3.4 (left panel) and in Niño1+2 (right panel), indicating that the next El Niño will emerge and strengthen in the course of 2026.
Sea ice is low at both poles. This results in loss of global albedo, which elevates temperatures. El Niño can be expected to further elevate temperatures in the course of 2026.
Adding to the problems, Arctic sea ice has become very thin. Arctic sea ice volume is at a record low for the time of year, it has been at a record daily low for well over a year. The above image shows Arctic sea ice volume through January 15, 2026.
As illustrated by the above image, Arctic sea ice volume in April 2025 was very low, so while relatively little melting took place between April 2025 and September 2025, a record low Arctic sea ice volume was still reached in September 2025. The above image shows Arctic sea ice volume through mid December 2025, with an analysis of the strength of the melting between April (annual maximum) and September (annual minimum). If the trend in annual maxima (blue circles) continues, Arctic sea ice in 2026 looks set to reach an even lower volume in April 2026. The difference between strong melting (magenta) and little melting (green) is 3000 km³, so if strong melting will take place from April 2026, this may well cause a Blue Ocean Event to occur later in 2026. A Blue Ocean Event could be said to occur when only 1000 km³ or less Arctic sea ice volume remains.
There is a huge danger that seafloor methane and methane from thawing terrestrial permafrost will add strongly and abruptly to the temperature rise, as discussed in many earlier posts such as this one and as illustrated by the screenshot below.
Carbon dioxide concentrations typically reach an annual maximum in May. The image below shows carbon dioxide concentrations (surface flasks) as high as 437 ppm recorded half 2025 at Mauna Loa, Hawaii.
Currently, concentrations of greenhouse gases at Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, are very high and rising. The image below is adapted from an image issued by NOAA January 8, 2026, and shows recent monthly carbon dioxide concentrations as high as 442 ppm.
The image below shows daily measurements of carbon dioxide concentrations from 2020
The above image and the images below are adapted from images issued by NOAA January 6, 2026.
These images show concentrations of greenhouse gases recorded at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North latitude.
The image below shows hourly average methane measurements from 2020.
The image below shows monthly average methane measurements from 2001.
The image below shows monthly average nitrous oxide measurements from 2016.
Temperatures
The image below with NASA Land-Only annual anomalies with respect to 1880-1912 shows that 1.5°C was crossed for all years from 2015 through 2025 (black squares). Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that 2°C was crossed after 2022 (in 2023, 2024 and 2025) and that 3°C may get crossed soon, as early as in 2031 if this trend continues (dashed extension). Note that the 1880-1912 base is not pre-industrial. Temperature anomalies can be even higher when a genuinely pre-industrial base is used.
The above image also illustrates how much difference it can make for temperature anomalies on land to go from a La Niña to an El Niño. The year 2022 was a La Niña year and the temperature anomaly on land was less than 1.8°C vs 1880-1912. El Niño conditions prevailed from March 2023 to March 2024, and the temperature anomaly in 2024 was about 0.6°C higher than it was in 2022. This makes one wonder by how much the temperature anomaly will go up compared to 2025, if El Niño conditions will emerge in 2026 and persist into 2027.
The image below illustrates that, in the Northern Hemisphere, 2025 was the third year in a row with temperature anomalies more than 1.5°C above 1951-1980 and much more when compared to pre-industrial. Note also that El Niño wasn't elevating temperatures in 2025.
The above image illustrates that, in the Northern Hemisphere, 2025 was the third year in a row with temperature anomalies higher than 1.5°C above 1951-1980. Note that temperature anomalies will be much higher when compared to pre-industrial. Note also that El Niño wasn't elevating the temperature in 2025.
As illustrated by the image on the right, the highest temperature anomalies in the Northern Hemisphere in 2025 occurred over the Arctic Ocean.
This is further illustrated by the image below that shows the NASA 2025 temperature anomaly.
The image below shows a temperature anomaly forecast, adapted from tropicaltidbits.com, valid for September 2026.
The image below shows a temperature anomaly forecast, adapted from tropicaltidbits.com, valid for October 2026, with anomalies at the top end of the scale (13°C) showing up over much of the Arctic Ocean.
In the video below, Guy McPherson discussed the danger of rising temperatures.
The heat in the Arctic also manifested itself in a Sudden Stratospheric Warming event recently, as illustrated by the image below.
[ click on images to enlarge ]
The above image illustrates how heat rising high up in the atmosphere resulted in temperatures as high as -23°C (-9.5°F) at 10 hPa over Russia at the green circle (globe on the left) on January 10, 2026.
At the same time, this resulted in very low temperatures at surface level. Temperatures of -41°C (41.9°F) were recorded at the green circle (globe on the right).
The image on the right illustrates that low surface (2 meter) temperatures can be expected to persist in January 2026. The image shows a forecast for January 29, 2026.
Climate Emergency Declaration
UN secretary-general António Guterres recently spoke about the need for “a credible global response plan to get us on track” regarding the international goal of limiting the global temperature rise. “The science demands action, the law commands it,” Guterres said, in reference to a recent international court of justice ruling. “The economics compel it and people are calling for it.”
What could be added is that the situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as this 2022 post and this one and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.
The image on the right was included in a poster featuring at the AGU Fall Meeting in 1991. The image warned about an escalating temperature rise in the Arctic, pointing at a 10°C rise in the Arctic by 2036. The poster warns that this rise threatens to trigger seafloor methane releases resulting in runaway global warming.
Over time, further contributors to the temperature rise have been highlighted with the warning that they could jointly trigger a total potential global temperature rise of 10°C as early as 2026.
A huge temperature rise threatens to unfold and it could do so as early as next year (2026), as illustrated by the image on the right. Altogether, the temperature rise from pre-industrial could be more than 18.44°C by the end of 2026.
The barchart on the right conceptually dates back to 2016, when a strong El Niño came with a strong temperature rise. When expressed by means of a polynomial trend that was extended by a decade, the trend pointed at a 10°C rise by 2026.
The barchart has basically remained the same over the past ten years, be it that the historic temperature rise from pre-industrial has turned out to be larger (pink) and that the cloud feedback could add a further 8°C to the rise (grey). Also, for clarity, aerosols have been split up into on the one hand sulfates (green) and on the other hand carbon monoxide, black & brown carbon and non-methane volatile organic carbon (brown).
Importantly, posts have over time pointed out that humans are likely to go extinct with a rise of 3°C and most life on Earth will disappear with a 5°C rise, as illustrated by the image below, from an analysis discussed in an earlier post.
With the year 2026 approaching fast, it is time to have another look at how fast and by how much temperatures could rise. The danger of a strong El Niño emerging in 2026 is highlighted below and this could come at a time when emissions are high, Earth's albedo is low and both land and ocean sinks are losing their capacity to take up carbon dioxide and heat.
The image below shows how, over the course of the year, temperature anomalies in 2023, 2024 and 2025 each have at times reached the highest daily records, even though 2025 wasn't an El Niño year. The image shows temperature anomalies from 1940 through to December 29, 2025, compared to 1991-2020, which isn't pre-industrial.
[ click on images to enlarge ]
The image below, from an earlier post, shows NASA Land Only monthly temperature anomalies (black squares) with respect to 1880-1890 (not pre-industrial) through November 2025 and shows the 1.5°C threshold crossed for all months since 2022. The Lowess 3-year smoothing trend (red line) indicates that the 2°C threshold was crossed in 2022 and that 3°C may get crossed in 2028 if this trend continues (dashed extension). The picture could look even worse when a genuinely pre-industrial base was used and a polynomial trend was applied and extended.
As said, the image at the top shows very high temperatures in 2025, even though 2025 wasn't an El Niño year. In other words, current temperatures are suppressed. Moving from the bottom of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño can in itself make a difference of more than 0.5°C. This is illustrated by the image below, from an earlier post, that shows a temperature rise of more than 0.5°C from November 2022 to March 2023, when the last El Niño had not yet even started.
[ Temperature rise due to El Niño from earlier post ]
How deep into La Niña conditions are we at the moment? Sea surface temperatures in the Niño-3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean (5°N-5°S, 120°W-170°W) are indicative for El Niño/La Niña conditions. The image below shows the location of that region (square on the globe, inset) and graphs with the sea surface temperatures in the Niño-3.4 region for each of the days of the years from 1981 through December 27, 2025.
The image below shows a graph with temperature anomalies in the Niño-3.4 region from 1950 through November 2025, when the anomaly was -0.68°C.
[ click on images to enlarge ]
The image on the right shows a NOAA update of Niño-3.4 region temperature anomalies and forecasts.
NOAA considers a La Niña event to occur when a one-month negative sea surface temperature anomaly of -0.5° C or less is observed in the Niño-3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean (5°N-5°S, 120°W-170°W) and is forecasted to persist for three consecutive months, while an atmospheric response typically associated with La Niña must also be observed over the equatorial Pacific Ocean.
The image on the right, adapted from NOAA, shows ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) probabilities, with El Niño (red bar) emerging in the course of 2026.
The graph below, adapted from tropicaltidbits, uses CDAS (Climate Data Assimilation System) data showing an anomaly of -1.272°C on Dec 28, 2025. The graph gives another idea as to how deep we have descended into La Niña conditions.
The CDAS analysis below shows very low sea surface temperature anomalies (in blue) in the Niño3.4 region in the Central Pacific on December 28, 2025.
The image below, adapted from ECMWF, shows the ENSO anomalies and forecasts for developments through November 2026 in Niño3.4 (left panel) and in Niño1+2 (right panel), indicating that the next El Niño will emerge and strengthen in the course of 2026.
Sea ice is low at both poles. The image below shows Antarctic sea ice on December 31, 2025. Massive loss of albedo amplifies the decline of Antarctic sea ice and the decline of the snow and ice cover over Antarctica, resulting in elevated global temperatures that could persist through September 2026, when Arctic sea ice typically reaches its minimum extent.
As discussed above, moving from the depth of a La Niña to the peak of a strong El Niño in itself could make a difference in the global temperature of more than 0.5°C. Add up feedbacks and the combined impact could trigger a huge temperature rise, since the rise is already accelerating, due to the self-amplifying nature of feedbacks such as albedo loss and more water vapor in the atmosphere, and due to further feedbacks that come with the temperature rise itself such as ocean stratification.
Oceans are still absorbing an estimated 91% of the excess heat energy trapped in the Earth's climate system due to human-caused global warming. If just a small part of that heat instead remains in the atmosphere, this could constitute a huge rise in air temperature. Heat already stored in the deeper layers of the ocean could also rise up and commit Earth to further additional surface warming in the future.
The image on the right illustrates how the temperature rise can cause oceans to take up less heat, resulting in more heat remaining in the atmosphere.
The above image shows very high temperature anomalies forecast around Antarctica and over the Arctic Ocean for September 2026, at a time when Arctic sea ice volume is expected to be very low. Arctic sea ice volume is at a record low for the time of year, it has been at a record daily low for well over a year. The image below shows Arctic sea ice volume through December 30, 2025.
There is a huge danger that seafloor methane and methane from thawing terrestrial permafrost will add strongly and abruptly to the temperature rise, as discussed in many earlier posts such as this one and as illustrated by the screenshot below.
The methane danger is further illustrated by the image below that shows hourly average in situ methane measurements well above 2400 ppb (parts per billion). The image is adapted from an image issued by NOAA December 31, 2025. The image shows methane recorded over the past few years at the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory (BRW), a NOAA facility located near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, at 71.32 degrees North latitude.
Climate Emergency Declaration
UN secretary-general António Guterres recently spoke about the need for “a credible global response plan to get us on track” regarding the international goal of limiting the global temperature rise. “The science demands action, the law commands it,” Guterres said, in reference to a recent international court of justice ruling. “The economics compel it and people are calling for it.”
What could be added is that the situation is dire and unacceptably dangerous, and the precautionary principle necessitates rapid, comprehensive and effective action to reduce the damage and to improve the outlook, where needed in combination with a Climate Emergency Declaration, as described in posts such as this 2022 post and this one and as discussed in the Climate Plan group.