An earlier post wondered whether maximum extent for this year had already been reached, i.e. on February 9, 2016, when sea ice extent was 14.214 million km2.
As illustrated by the image below, extent since has been lower, including on the two most recent days on the image, i.e. on February 16 and 17, 2016, when extent was respectively 14.208 and 14.203 million km2.
Last year (2015), maximum sea ice extent was reached on February 25. That's close to the most recent date on the image of February 17, so with El Nino still going strong, it may well be that the maximum in 2016 will be reached early.
On the other hand, strong winds could spread out the sea ice and speed up its drift out of the Arctic Ocean, which may result in a larger extent, but which won't do much to strengthen the sea ice.
UPDATES: On February 18, 2016 (arrow), Arctic sea ice extent was 14.186 million square km, i.e. less than it was on February 9. In fact, sea ice extent hasn't been higher on any day since February 9, 2016. So, the question is, has this year's maximum extent already passed us by (i.e. on February 9)?
The image below shows the heat is having a huge impact on the sea ice, with some areas (black) showing sea surface temperature anomalies above 8°C (or above 14.4°F).
Ominously, sea surface off the North American east coast was as much as 11.8°C or 21.3°F warmer on February 19, 2016, than it was in 1981-2011 (at the location marked by the green circle in the image below).
Temperatures over the Arctic Ocean are forecast to remain extremely high for the next five days, with anomalies in a large part of the Arctic Ocean at the top end of the scale, i.e. 20°C or 36°F.
As the image below shows, Arctic sea ice area was at a record low for the time of year on February 18, 2016.
The image below shows that Arctic sea ice extent on February 20, 2016, was only 14.166
million km2 (arrow), adding to fears that this year's maximum was already reached on February 9.
The image below shows that Arctic sea ice extent on February 21, 2016, was only 14.160
million km2 (arrow), further fueling fears that this year's maximum was already reached on February 9.
Further analysis indicates that these high levels likely originated from destabilizing methane hydrates in sediments, from a location about latitude 85°North and longitude +105° (East), on the Gakkel Ridge, just outside the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, at the location of the red marker on the map below.
Below is a comparison map, from grida.no
for large-size image, go to grida.no |
zoom in and out at nullschool.net |
On February 18, 2016 (arrow), Arctic sea ice extent was 14.186 million square km, i.e. less than it was on February 9....
Posted by Sam Carana on Friday, February 19, 2016
Hello Sam
ReplyDeleteI'm back at writing my French blog ; Le Climatoblogue
I got 11 cc's or so of cortisone shots into my back and neck in the last 2'ish weeks
It helps big time :-)
This is my latest article if you have time : http://leclimatoblogue.blogspot.ca/2016/02/pas-dhiver-en-arctique-pour-2016-et.html
I used one of your latest sea ice extent ir, thank you as always
Take care and keep fighting
Jack
Hi Sam I’m layperson & New Zealander been following you for few years & putting your latest methane observation on my Like column Twitter page. I’m alarmed at what is above Aussie this time. Are the white slashes travelling rather like waves on the sea and is what shows in white over Aussie like a tsunami wave high up in the atmosphere?? I understood a few yrs ago that the Arctic veil was travelling south at 1K day and would reach NZ in 6 or so years from now? I had read of Natalia Shakhova and Peter Waddams’ warnings in Bill McGuire’s book few yrs ago and that it could happen very quickly??
ReplyDeleteAnother area interests me is Antarctic ice melt. Is it known how long the pure melted ice sits on the heavier sea as it moves from West to East? Is it likely to be cause of NZ’s unusually cold winter last year as wind blows across it?? DIANA @DianaBroadhead
Hi Diana, the white geometric shapes showing up on the methane image result from the way the polar-orbiting satellite circum-navigates the globe, as depicted on this image. Because the sensor didn't cover these white areas, no measurements were taken there. Also, no data are available for the grey areas, due to quality control failure, which indicates reading difficulties that could be caused, e.g. by high moisture levels (i.e. snow, rain or water vapor).
DeleteYou can follow Antarctica's sea ice area here. Sea ice, winds, ocean heat, temperature difference between Equator and Poles and further factors can all contribute to winters being colder or warmer than they used to be. The Arctic-news blog seeks to keep readers informed on new developments with a focus on the Arctic.